From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752564Ab3ABEKZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2013 23:10:25 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:45205 "EHLO mail-pa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752525Ab3ABEKX (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2013 23:10:23 -0500 Message-ID: <50E3B32A.8070807@lwfinger.net> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 22:10:18 -0600 From: Larry Finger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Viresh Kumar CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM list , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Fix problem with cpufreq_ondemand or cpufreq_conservative References: <50DE378D.4090008@lwfinger.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/01/2013 09:56 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > I know, V4 is already accepted, but i had an small comment with one > of your earlier change, which doesn't exist anymore :) > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Larry Finger wrote: >> Index: wireless-testing-new/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c > > How are you creating these patches? wireless-testing-new (linux directory names) > aren't supposed to be present here. > >> =================================================================== >> --- wireless-testing-new.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c >> +++ wireless-testing-new/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c >> @@ -316,3 +316,8 @@ second_time: >> return 0; >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_governor_dbs); >> + >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Alexander Clouter "); > > You shouldn't be adding yourself as author here :) > > MODULE_AUTHOR("Venkatesh Pallipadi "); > MODULE_AUTHOR("Alexey Starikovskiy "); I was not adding myself - my name is not Alexander Clouter. When we were creating a new module, I got the author from the module that cpufreq_governor was originally a part. Perhaps I got the name wrong. Thanks for the review mentioned in the next Email. Larry