From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753227Ab3ACGRF (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 01:17:05 -0500 Received: from hqemgate04.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.35]:11288 "EHLO hqemgate04.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751625Ab3ACGRE (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 01:17:04 -0500 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp07.nvidia.com on Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:12:56 -0800 Message-ID: <50E5224D.7010404@nvidia.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:46:45 +0530 From: Laxman Dewangan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Marc Dietrich , "akpm@linuxfoundation.org" , "a.zummo@towertech.it" , "rtc-linux@googlegroups.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] rtc: add RTC driver for TPS6586x References: <1356102748-722-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <7345841.MepJzddHFh@ax5200p> <50DC6242.1000404@nvidia.com> <20130102155057.9fb6ede2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20130102155057.9fb6ede2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 03 January 2013 05:20 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:29:14 +0530 > Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >> On Thursday 27 December 2012 08:26 PM, Marc Dietrich wrote: >>> Hi Laxman, >>> >>> On Friday 21 December 2012 20:42:28 you wrote: >>> >>>> + >>>> + /* Set epoch start as 00:00:00:01:01:2000 */ >>>> + rtc->epoch_start = mktime(2000, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0); >>> any reason why you hard coded it to 2000? All boards I know use 2009, so with >>> this patch, everyone needs to set his clock again. >>> >> No specific reason. If 2009 should be default then I can push patch to >> set it as 2009. > I'd like to get this into Linus soon so let's get it finished. I > assume it's merely this? Yes, the following change is only require. I was waiting for driver to be avilable on linux-next before sending patch to avoid any conflict. Thanks a lot for taking care.