From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755743Ab3AECpz (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:45:55 -0500 Received: from [216.228.121.35] ([216.228.121.35]:2727 "EHLO hqemgate04.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755686Ab3AECpu (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:45:50 -0500 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp05.nvidia.com on Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:44:55 -0800 Message-ID: <50E793A0.4020702@nvidia.com> Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:14:48 +0530 From: Prashant Gaikwad User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Warren CC: "mturquette@linaro.org" , Stephen Warren , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com" , "linux@prisktech.co.nz" , "josh.cartwright@ni.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] clk: tegra: Use common of_clk_init() function References: <1357282858-2112-1-git-send-email-pgaikwad@nvidia.com> <1357282858-2112-2-git-send-email-pgaikwad@nvidia.com> <50E703A8.1080808@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: <50E703A8.1080808@wwwdotorg.org> X-NVConfidentiality: public Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 04 January 2013 10:00 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 01/04/2013 12:00 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote: >> Use common of_clk_init() function for clocks initialization. >> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 3 ++- >> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 3 ++- > Oh, so this series is written assuming that the Tegra CCF rework is > already applied then? That makes the dependencies quite painful, since I > think we'll end up with the following order being needed: > > 1) clk: Add composite clock type > -> This would usually go through the clk tree. > 2) The Tegra CCF rework series > -> This must go through the Tegra tree due to lots of dependencies > and merge conflicts with other Tegra patches. > 3) This series > -> This would usually go through the clk tree. > > Is it possible to re-order the dependencies as (1) (3) (2), so that Mike > can apply (1) and (3) to the clock tree, then I can use the clk tree as > the basis for a branch in the Tegra tree to apply (2) and all the other > Tegra patches that will conflict with (2)? If Mike approves the concept and implementation in (1) and (3) then I will repost (2) and (3) with dependencies re-ordered.