From: Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: MODSIGN: Modules fail signature verification with -ENOKEY
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:28:08 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F10278.3050309@csamuel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+5PVA5hCuTar1F=g5vgT2Cj1ZbF7w+HcWzhATUx7wFs_kuSWw@mail.gmail.com>
/* Please CC, not on LKML */
Hi Josh,
On 12/01/13 00:44, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Check the installed modules. A simple:
>
> hexdump -C <path to module> | tail -n 20
>
> should be enough to tell you if the installed modules at least look like
> they're signed. You should see the expected "~Module signature appended~"
> string. You could also check the modules in the kernel build tree for
> the same thing. [...]
Good call - neither the modules in the build tree, nor the installed
ones are signed. I did a "make mrproper", changed scripts/sign-file to
be verbose by default and rebuilt. That confirmed that the modules are
getting signed, which left the possibility of make-kpkg stripping the
modules after compiling as an option.
Google pointed me at the likely culprit, a patch from a certain Mr Ted
Ts'o in 2009 to make-kpkg so that it would strip kernel modules by default.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517290
I'll file a bug against it asking for the it to not strip if
CONFIG_MODULE_SIG is set.
Thanks for the pointer!
Chris
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-12 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <50EEA4C4.4080103@csamuel.org>
2013-01-11 9:41 ` Fwd: MODSIGN: Modules fail signature verification with -ENOKEY Chris Samuel
2013-01-11 13:44 ` Josh Boyer
2013-01-12 6:28 ` Chris Samuel [this message]
2013-01-12 13:08 ` Josh Boyer
2013-01-12 22:33 ` Chris Samuel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F10278.3050309@csamuel.org \
--to=chris@csamuel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jwboyer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox