public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: MODSIGN: Modules fail signature verification with -ENOKEY
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:28:08 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F10278.3050309@csamuel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+5PVA5hCuTar1F=g5vgT2Cj1ZbF7w+HcWzhATUx7wFs_kuSWw@mail.gmail.com>

/* Please CC, not on LKML */

Hi Josh,

On 12/01/13 00:44, Josh Boyer wrote:

> Check the installed modules.  A simple:
>
>      hexdump -C <path to module> | tail -n 20
>
> should be enough to tell you if the installed modules at least look like
> they're signed.  You should see the expected "~Module signature appended~"
> string.  You could also check the modules in the kernel build tree for
> the same thing. [...]

Good call - neither the modules in the build tree, nor the installed 
ones are signed.   I did a "make mrproper", changed scripts/sign-file to 
be verbose by default and rebuilt.  That confirmed that the modules are 
getting signed, which left the possibility of make-kpkg stripping the 
modules after compiling as an option.

Google pointed me at the likely culprit, a patch from a certain Mr Ted 
Ts'o in 2009 to make-kpkg so that it would strip kernel modules by default.

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517290

I'll file a bug against it asking for the it to not strip if 
CONFIG_MODULE_SIG is set.

Thanks for the pointer!
Chris
-- 
  Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-12  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <50EEA4C4.4080103@csamuel.org>
2013-01-11  9:41 ` Fwd: MODSIGN: Modules fail signature verification with -ENOKEY Chris Samuel
2013-01-11 13:44   ` Josh Boyer
2013-01-12  6:28     ` Chris Samuel [this message]
2013-01-12 13:08       ` Josh Boyer
2013-01-12 22:33         ` Chris Samuel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50F10278.3050309@csamuel.org \
    --to=chris@csamuel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jwboyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox