From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754507Ab3ALWdd (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:33:33 -0500 Received: from csamuel.org ([74.50.50.137]:43865 "EHLO csamuel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754271Ab3ALWdc (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:33:32 -0500 Message-ID: <50F1E4A5.4000002@csamuel.org> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:33:09 +1100 From: Chris Samuel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josh Boyer CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell , dhowells@redhat.com Subject: Re: MODSIGN: Modules fail signature verification with -ENOKEY References: <50EEA4C4.4080103@csamuel.org> <50EFDE31.90709@csamuel.org> <50F10278.3050309@csamuel.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org /* Please CC, not on LKML */ On 13/01/13 00:08, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Chris Samuel wrote: > >> [...Debian kernel-build...] >> I'll file a bug against it asking for the it to not strip if >> CONFIG_MODULE_SIG is set. >> >> Thanks for the pointer! > > Great. Glad you figured it out. It raises a question - if we have CONFIG_MODULE_SIG should we disable stripping modules in the top level Makefile as it's going to break things? The parsing for CONFIG_MODULE_SIG happens right after that for INSTALL_MOD_STRIP so the stripping could be disabled with with: mod_strip_cmd = true export strip_cmd cheers, Chris -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC