From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: Rework acpi_bus_trim()
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:38:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F4A4FC.3070904@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3885603.ydrrB7OEKf@vostro.rjw.lan>
2013/01/15 6:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This series of patches changes the way acpi_bus_trim() works so that,
> eventually, it walks the namespace twice detaching (ACPI) drivers from
> device nodes being removed in the first pass and removing the device
> nodes in the second pass.
>
> The first two patches are just cleanups removing unused stuff:
>
> [1/5] Remove the ops field from struct acpi_device (unrelated to the rest).
> [2/5] Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister().
>
> The next three patches actually rework acpi_bus_trim() in three steps:
>
> [3/5] Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_trim() (all callers pass 1 in there
> anyway.
> [4/5] Reimplement acpi_bus_trim() using acpi_walk_namespace().
> [3/5] Make acpi_bus_trim() carry out two passes as described above.
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> I'm aware of the fact that this will conflict with the patches that Yinghai
> posted a few days ago, but in my opinion the changes here are prerequisite for
> the Yinghai's patchset.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-15 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-14 21:33 [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: Rework acpi_bus_trim() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 21:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] ACPI: Remove the ops field from struct acpi_device Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 21:37 ` [PATCH 2/5] ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 21:37 ` [PATCH 3/5] ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_trim() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 21:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] ACPI / scan: Change the implementation " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 21:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] ACPI / scan: Add second pass to acpi_bus_trim() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 23:13 ` Toshi Kani
2013-01-14 23:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 22:21 ` [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: Rework acpi_bus_trim() Yinghai Lu
2013-01-14 23:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-15 0:38 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F4A4FC.3070904@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox