From: Richard Mortimer <richm@oldelvet.org.uk>
To: Cong Ding <dinggnu@gmail.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sparc: kernel/sbus.c: fix memory leakage
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:30:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F7EED3.1050309@oldelvet.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130117115637.GB25615@gmail.com>
On 17/01/2013 11:56, Cong Ding wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:41:59AM +0000, Richard Mortimer wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 16/01/2013 22:01, Cong Ding wrote:
>>> the variable iommu and strbuf are not freed if it goes to error.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cong Ding <dinggnu@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/sparc/kernel/sbus.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/sbus.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/sbus.c
>>> index 1271b3a..78aa26b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/sbus.c
>>> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/sbus.c
>>> @@ -656,6 +656,8 @@ static void __init sbus_iommu_init(struct platform_device *op)
>>> return;
>>>
>>> fatal_memory_error:
>>> + kfree(strbuf);
>>
>> strbuf will be uninitialized if the iommu allocation fails. I don't
>> have a particular preference for how to fix this but tend to dislike
>> initial assignment with NULL because it hides other control flow
>> issues.
> Sorry I didn't notice strbuf will be uninitialized here. But if we don't
> initially assign a NULL value to strbuf, I cannot find a way to handle it
> besides the first version patch. Did you have any suggestions? For me, I like
> the first version.
Two thoughts...
1 - just use a goto target for the iommu allocation failure and make
that skip the strbuf free call. The others use the existing
fatal_memory_error label.
2 - Move the strbuf kzalloc up 2 lines so that it occurs before the test
for iommu.
2b - In case (2) above the failure test could be changed to
if (!iommu || !strbuf)
to remove duplication of goto.
I'd probably go for 2/2b to address Sam's initial comment.
Regards
Richard
> - cong
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>> + kfree(iommu);
>>> prom_printf("sbus_iommu_init: Fatal memory allocation error.\n");
>>> }
>>>
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-14 21:36 [PATCH] sparc: kernel/sbus.c: fix memory leakage Cong Ding
2013-01-16 21:13 ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-01-16 21:17 ` Cong Ding
2013-01-16 22:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-01-16 22:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Cong Ding
2013-01-17 10:41 ` Richard Mortimer
2013-01-17 11:56 ` Cong Ding
2013-01-17 12:30 ` Richard Mortimer [this message]
2013-01-17 13:16 ` Cong Ding
2013-01-17 13:28 ` [PATCH v3] " Cong Ding
2013-01-21 22:20 ` Richard Mortimer
2013-01-21 22:34 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F7EED3.1050309@oldelvet.org.uk \
--to=richm@oldelvet.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dinggnu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox