From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755248Ab3ARANy (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:13:54 -0500 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([64.131.90.16]:54380 "EHLO mx2.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753123Ab3ARANx (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:13:53 -0500 Message-ID: <50F893D2.7080103@parallels.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:14:10 -0800 From: Glauber Costa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Chinner CC: , , , , Greg Thelen , Ying Han , Suleiman Souhlal Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/19] list_lru: per-node list infrastructure References: <1354058086-27937-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1354058086-27937-10-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <50F6FDC8.5020909@parallels.com> <20130116225521.GF2498@dastard> <50F7475F.90609@parallels.com> <20130117042245.GG2498@dastard> <50F84118.7030608@parallels.com> <20130118001029.GK2498@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20130118001029.GK2498@dastard> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [216.239.55.193] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/17/2013 04:10 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > And then each object uses: > > struct lru_item { > struct list_head global_list; > struct list_head memcg_list; > } by objects you mean dentries, inodes, and the such, right? Would it be acceptable to you? We've been of course doing our best to avoid increasing the size of the objects, therefore this is something we've never mentioned. However, if it would be acceptable from the fs POV, this would undoubtedly make our life extremely easier.