From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751411Ab3ARQpJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:45:09 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0069.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.69]:50873 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750928Ab3ARQpH (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:45:07 -0500 X-Panda: scanned! X-Spam-Summary: 50,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,jason@warr.net,:::::::::::,RULES_HIT:355:379:481:599:601:800:854:945:967:972:973:988:989:1187:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2525:2553:2560:2563:2682:2685:2828:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3027:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3353:3657:3865:3866:3867:3868:3869:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:3956:3959:4250:4384:5007:6117:6120:7652:7679:7901:7903:8599:9010:9025:10004:10128:10400:10848:11253:11658:11854:11914:12043:12050:12517:12519:12740:12776,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-Session-Marker: 6A61736F6E40776172722E6E6574 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2961 Message-ID: <50F97C0F.9010405@warr.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:45:03 -0600 From: Jason Warr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Amit Kale , device-mapper development , "kent.overstreet@gmail.com" , Mike Snitzer , LKML , "linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Announcement: STEC EnhanceIO SSD caching software for Linux kernel References: <20130116104546.GA3869@raspberrypi> <20130117132620.GA2438@raspberrypi> <50F844A3.9020300@warr.net> <50F970A3.4000403@warr.net> <20130118161135.GA3118@raspberrypi> In-Reply-To: <20130118161135.GA3118@raspberrypi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/18/2013 10:11 AM, thornber@redhat.com wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:56:19AM -0600, Jason Warr wrote: >> If I can help test and benchmark all three of these solutions please >> ask. I have allot of hardware resources available to me and perhaps I >> can add value from an outsiders perspective. > We'd love your help. Perhaps you could devise a test that represents > how you'd use it? > > - Joe > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html As much as I dislike Oracle that is one of my primary applications. I am attempting to get one of my customers to setup an Oracle instance that is modular in that I can move the storage around to fit a particular hardware setup and have a consistent benchmark that they use in the real world to gauge performance. One of them is a debit card transaction clearing entity on multi-TB databases so latency REALLY matters there. Hopefully I'll have a couple of them setup within a week. At that point I may need help in getting the proper kernel trees and patch sets munged into a working kernel. That seems to be the spot where I fall over most of the time. Unfortunately I probably could not share this specific setup but it is likely that I can derive a version from it that can be opened.