From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752440Ab3AUIuR (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 03:50:17 -0500 Received: from hotel311.server4you.de ([85.25.146.15]:43892 "EHLO hotel311.server4you.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751861Ab3AUIuP (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 03:50:15 -0500 Message-ID: <50FD0144.1000401@monom.org> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:50:12 +0100 From: Daniel Wagner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Li Zefan CC: John Fastabend , Neil Horman , Daniel Wagner , LKML , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Cgroups Subject: Re: [BUG] Bug in netprio_cgroup and netcls_cgroup ? References: <50FCDB5C.4050608@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <50FCDB5C.4050608@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Li, On 21.01.2013 07:08, Li Zefan wrote: > I'm not a network developer, so correct me if I'm wrong. > > Since commit 7955490f732c2b8 > ("net: netprio_cgroup: rework update socket logic"), sock->sk->sk_cgrp_prioidx > is set when the socket is created, and won't be updated unless the task is > moved to another cgroup. > > Now the problem is, a socket can be _shared_ by multiple processes (fork, SCM_RIGHT). > If we place those processes in different cgroups, and each cgroup has > different configs, but all of the processes will send data via this socket > with the same network priority. Wouldn't that be addressed by 48a87cc26c13b68f6cce4e9d769fcb17a6b3e4b8 net: netprio: fd passed in SCM_RIGHTS datagram not set correctly A socket fd passed in a SCM_RIGHTS datagram was not getting updated with the new tasks cgrp prioidx. This leaves IO on the socket tagged with the old tasks priority. To fix this add a check in the scm recvmsg path to update the sock cgrp prioidx with the new tasks value. As I read this this should work for net_prio. > Similar with cls cgroup. but not for cls_cgroup because I forgot to apply that fix as well. Just a sec, about to send a patch for this. Thanks for looking into this! cheers, daniel