From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre@andrep.de>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: kernel 3.7+ cpufreq regression on AMD system running as dom0
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:22:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FD32FA.7010306@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130118200331.GF4062@pd.tnic>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2722 bytes --]
On 01/18/2013 08:03 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 02:00:15PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> I did not explain myself well. The fix is OK - it just that the
>> hypervisor causes the quirk to not work correctly. Hmm, I wonder if
>> there BIOSes that do the same thing (cause the MSR to return 0). Per
>> you estimation of BIOS quality, it seems that this could happen.
>
> Yeah, I don't think there's a limit to the amount of SNAFU a BIOS can
> cause :-).
>
So for having the "check for sensible BIOS" in mainline I refreshed the patch
(fixed the bit test, and actually tested it this time) and also added some
hopefully sensible explanation to it (attached below).
Should I send it to acpi lists or would that have to go via an Andre?
-Stefan
From 6e2fc8291c91339123a37162382d8b08b50867ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:17:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Check MSR valid bit before using P-state frequencies
To fix incorrect P-state frequencies which can happen on
some AMD systems f594065faf4f9067c2283a34619fc0714e79a98d
"ACPI: Add fixups for AMD P-state figures"
introduced a quirk to obtain the correct values by reading
from AMD specific MSRs.
This did cause a regression when running a kernel using that
quirk under Xen which does (currently) not pass on the contents
of the HW but 0. And this seems to cause a failure to initialize
the ondemand governour (hard to say for sure as all P-states
appear to run at the same frequency).
While this should also be fixed in the hypervisor (to allow
a guest to read that MSR), this patch is intended to work
around the issue in the meantime. In discussion it turned out
that indeed real HW/BIOSes may choose to not set the valid bit
and thus mark the P-state as invalid. So this could be considered
a fix for broken BIOSes that also works around the issue on Xen.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.7..
---
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index 836bfe0..41f4bdac 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -340,6 +340,9 @@ static void amd_fixup_frequency(struct acpi_processor_px
*px, int i)
if ((boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model < 10)
|| boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x11) {
rdmsr(MSR_AMD_PSTATE_DEF_BASE + index, lo, hi);
+ /* Bit 63 indicates whether contents are valid */
+ if (!(hi & 0x80000000))
+ return;
fid = lo & 0x3f;
did = (lo >> 6) & 7;
if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10)
--
1.8.0
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-ACPI-Check-MSR-valid-bit-before-using-P-state-freque.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1932 bytes --]
>From 6e2fc8291c91339123a37162382d8b08b50867ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:17:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Check MSR valid bit before using P-state frequencies
To fix incorrect P-state frequencies which can happen on
some AMD systems f594065faf4f9067c2283a34619fc0714e79a98d
"ACPI: Add fixups for AMD P-state figures"
introduced a quirk to obtain the correct values by reading
from AMD specific MSRs.
This did cause a regression when running a kernel using that
quirk under Xen which does (currently) not pass on the contents
of the HW but 0. And this seems to cause a failure to initialize
the ondemand governour (hard to say for sure as all P-states
appear to run at the same frequency).
While this should also be fixed in the hypervisor (to allow
a guest to read that MSR), this patch is intended to work
around the issue in the meantime. In discussion it turned out
that indeed real HW/BIOSes may choose to not set the valid bit
and thus mark the P-state as invalid. So this could be considered
a fix for broken BIOSes that also works around the issue on Xen.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.7..
---
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index 836bfe0..41f4bdac 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -340,6 +340,9 @@ static void amd_fixup_frequency(struct acpi_processor_px *px, int i)
if ((boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model < 10)
|| boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x11) {
rdmsr(MSR_AMD_PSTATE_DEF_BASE + index, lo, hi);
+ /* Bit 63 indicates whether contents are valid */
+ if (!(hi & 0x80000000))
+ return;
fid = lo & 0x3f;
did = (lo >> 6) & 7;
if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10)
--
1.8.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-21 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-14 15:58 kernel 3.7+ cpufreq regression on AMD system running as dom0 Stefan Bader
2013-01-14 16:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-14 16:55 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-01-14 17:08 ` Stefan Bader
2013-01-14 17:40 ` André Przywara
2013-01-15 17:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-15 18:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-18 19:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-18 19:38 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2013-01-18 20:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-18 22:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-21 12:22 ` Stefan Bader [this message]
2013-01-21 12:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-21 12:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-21 13:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-21 13:11 ` Stefan Bader
2013-01-21 15:03 ` Stefan Bader
2013-01-21 15:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-22 13:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-22 0:01 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2013-01-16 10:26 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-16 14:34 ` Stefan Bader
2013-01-15 13:04 ` Matt Wilson
2013-01-15 17:59 ` [Xen-devel] " Matt Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50FD32FA.7010306@canonical.com \
--to=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
--cc=andre@andrep.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox