From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de>
To: Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] coccicheck: Allow the user to give a VERBOSE= argument
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:05:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FEAAC6.3090409@itwm.fraunhofer.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAxaTiOCLyNJt0Bmqg+7t1knByKfSUpiCDCGm85vtHveDJDzGw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Nicolas,
On 01/22/2013 03:31 PM, Nicolas Palix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you Bernd for your proposition.
>
> I added Michal in CC, who is responsible for the integration.
Oh, sorry, I CCed everyone, but forgot Michal.
>
> I was wondering if the V variable which already exists would not be better
> than introducing a new variable. Bernd, is there any reason to not use V ?
I'm fine using 'V' either.
>
> Your patch also remove the check of the ONLINE variable. In doing so,
> I think that your patch will badly interfere with the online checking
> performed with the C variable. Am I missing something ?
Hmm, I probably should have told in the patch description that verbosity
defaults to 0 now. Shall I revert or make an extra patch for that? With
the current patch and ONLINE != 0 nothing will change.
Cheers,
Bernd
>
> Regards,
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Bernd Schubert
> <bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>> Simply running "make coccicheck" returns very verbose output and warnings
>> might not be noticed. Allow the user to set the verbosity level.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de>
>> CC: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
>> CC: Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
>> CC: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
>> ---
>> scripts/coccicheck | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/coccicheck b/scripts/coccicheck
>> index 1a49d1c..eab0b00 100755
>> --- a/scripts/coccicheck
>> +++ b/scripts/coccicheck
>> @@ -2,6 +2,12 @@
>>
>> SPATCH="`which ${SPATCH:=spatch}`"
>>
>> +if [ -z "$VERBOSE" ] ; then
>> + RUN_VERBOSE=0
>> +else
>> + RUN_VERBOSE=$VERBOSE
>> +fi
>> +
>> if [ "$C" = "1" -o "$C" = "2" ]; then
>> ONLINE=1
>>
>> @@ -55,7 +61,7 @@ coccinelle () {
>> #
>> # $SPATCH -D $MODE $FLAGS -parse_cocci $COCCI $OPT > /dev/null
>>
>> - if [ "$ONLINE" = "0" ] ; then
>> + if [ "$RUN_VERBOSE" != "0" ] ; then
>>
>> FILE=`echo $COCCI | sed "s|$srctree/||"`
>>
>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-22 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 13:34 [PATCH 1/2] coccicheck: Allow the user to give a VERBOSE= argument Bernd Schubert
2013-01-22 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] coccicheck: Allow to show the executed command line Bernd Schubert
2013-01-22 14:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] coccicheck: Allow the user to give a VERBOSE= argument Nicolas Palix
2013-01-22 15:05 ` Bernd Schubert [this message]
2013-01-23 8:29 ` Nicolas Palix
2013-02-01 10:36 ` Bernd Schubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50FEAAC6.3090409@itwm.fraunhofer.de \
--to=bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox