From: Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@xs4all.nl>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@amd.com>
Cc: suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, "Jacob Shin" <jacob.shin@amd.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>, "Jörg Rödel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.6.11 AMD-Vi: Completion-Wait loop timed out
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:27:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FEAFEB.7020103@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FEA3F2.1070408@amd.com>
On 2013-01-22 15:36, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Gigabyte demonstrate that using ESX 5i IOMMU works fine. (with pictures
>> attached).
>
> There are no attachments to your message.
Correct, gigabyte did send them via their support web-interface.
Do yo uneed to see them? They just show IOMMU enabled or similar.
>> What can we bring against that?
>
> How reproducible is the problem that you are seeing?
Seen once over here. Correlated with raid-check.
Udo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-22 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-20 10:33 3.6.11 AMD-Vi: Completion-Wait loop timed out Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-20 10:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-20 10:40 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-20 11:19 ` Jörg Rödel
2013-01-20 11:25 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-20 11:40 ` Jörg Rödel
2013-01-20 11:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-20 11:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-20 11:59 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-20 12:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-20 11:52 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-20 11:57 ` Jörg Rödel
2013-01-21 13:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-21 14:10 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-21 14:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-21 15:10 ` Jörg Rödel
2013-01-21 15:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-21 15:34 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-04-21 1:03 ` Jake
2013-04-21 21:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-21 14:37 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-01-21 14:44 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-21 14:47 ` Jörg Rödel
2013-01-21 16:04 ` Jacob Shin
2013-01-21 22:35 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-01-22 3:22 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-22 14:13 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-22 14:36 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-01-22 15:16 ` Jörg Rödel
2013-01-22 15:27 ` Udo van den Heuvel [this message]
2013-01-22 16:12 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-01-22 16:29 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-22 23:29 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-01-23 14:19 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-23 15:00 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-01-23 14:23 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-23 15:01 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-01-31 15:42 ` Udo van den Heuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50FEAFEB.7020103@xs4all.nl \
--to=udovdh@xs4all.nl \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox