From: Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@xs4all.nl>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@amd.com>
Cc: suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, "Jacob Shin" <jacob.shin@amd.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>, "Jörg Rödel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.6.11 AMD-Vi: Completion-Wait loop timed out
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:29:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FEBE5D.7040905@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FEBA69.60106@amd.com>
On 2013-01-22 17:12, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Seen once over here. Correlated with raid-check.
>
> Then the answer from Gigabyte doesn't prove anything. You can also boot
> Linux without seeing this problem in most cases.
That was my situation until the first time it hit.
> Your BIOS does not have the required erratum workaround. We will provide
> a patch to close that hole but since the problem is not easily
> reproducible (and the erratum is also not easy to trigger) it may be
> difficult to say whether it really helped with your problem.
Can we think of certain loads/actions/etc that could help trigger the issue?
Then if reproducing is easier we can better say if stuff is actually
fixed after the workaround.
Udo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-22 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-20 10:33 3.6.11 AMD-Vi: Completion-Wait loop timed out Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-20 10:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-20 10:40 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-20 11:19 ` Jörg Rödel
2013-01-20 11:25 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-20 11:40 ` Jörg Rödel
2013-01-20 11:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-20 11:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-20 11:59 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-20 12:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-20 11:52 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-20 11:57 ` Jörg Rödel
2013-01-21 13:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-21 14:10 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-21 14:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-21 15:10 ` Jörg Rödel
2013-01-21 15:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-21 15:34 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-04-21 1:03 ` Jake
2013-04-21 21:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-21 14:37 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-01-21 14:44 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-21 14:47 ` Jörg Rödel
2013-01-21 16:04 ` Jacob Shin
2013-01-21 22:35 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-01-22 3:22 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-22 14:13 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-22 14:36 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-01-22 15:16 ` Jörg Rödel
2013-01-22 15:27 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-22 16:12 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-01-22 16:29 ` Udo van den Heuvel [this message]
2013-01-22 23:29 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-01-23 14:19 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-23 15:00 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-01-23 14:23 ` Udo van den Heuvel
2013-01-23 15:01 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-01-31 15:42 ` Udo van den Heuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50FEBE5D.7040905@xs4all.nl \
--to=udovdh@xs4all.nl \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox