public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Leandro Lucarella <leandro.lucarella@sociomantic.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Doubts about listen backlog and tcp_max_syn_backlog
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:01:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FF0C25.9000300@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130122184245.GJ4608@sociomantic.com>

On 01/22/2013 10:42 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:17:50AM -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
>>> What is important is the backlog, and I guess you didn't increase it
>>> properly. The somaxconn default is quite low (128)
>>
>> Leandro -
>>
>> If that is being overflowed, I believe you should be seeing something like:
>>
>>      14 SYNs to LISTEN sockets dropped
>>
>> in the output of netstat -s on the system on which the server
>> application is running.
>
> What is that value reporting exactly?

Netstat is reporting the ListenDrops and/or ListenOverflows  which map 
to LINUX_MIB_LISTENDROPS and LINUX_MIB_LISTENOVERFLOWS.  Those get 
incremented in tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock() (and its v6 version etc)

        if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk))
                 goto exit_overflow;

Will increment both overflows and drops, and drops will increment on its 
own in some additional cases.

> Because we are using syncookies, and AFAIK with that enabled, all
> SYNs are being replied, and what the listen backlog is really
> limitting is the "completely established sockets waiting to be
> accepted", according to listen(2). What I don't really know to be
> honest, is what a "completely established socket" is, does it mean
> that the SYN,ACK was sent, or the ACK was received back?

I have always thought it meant that the ACK of the SYN|ACK has been 
received.

SyncookiesSent SyncookiesRecv SyncookiesFailed also appear in 
/proc/net/netstat and presumably in netstat -s output.

> Also, from the client side, when is the connect(2) call done? When the
> SYN,ACK is received?

That would be my assumption.


In a previous message:

> What I'm seeing are clients taking either useconds to connect, or 3
> seconds, which suggest SYNs are getting lost, but the network doesn't
> seem to be the problem. I'm still investigating this, so unfortunately
> I'm not really sure.

I recently ran into something like that, which turned-out to be an issue 
with nf_conntrack and its table filling.

rick

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-22 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-22 16:10 Doubts about listen backlog and tcp_max_syn_backlog Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-22 16:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-22 16:59   ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-22 17:13     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-22 18:17       ` Rick Jones
2013-01-22 18:42         ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-22 22:01           ` Rick Jones [this message]
2013-01-23 10:47             ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-23 19:28               ` Rick Jones
2013-01-24 12:22                 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-24 18:44                   ` Rick Jones
2013-01-24 19:21                     ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-25  6:12                       ` Nivedita SInghvi
2013-01-25 10:05                         ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-28  2:48                           ` Nivedita Singhvi
2013-01-28  5:21                             ` Vijay Subramanian
2013-01-28 14:40                               ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-28 13:08                             ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-28  2:49                           ` Nivedita Singhvi
2013-01-23 20:48               ` Vijay Subramanian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50FF0C25.9000300@hp.com \
    --to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=leandro.lucarella@sociomantic.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox