public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: snakky.zhang@gmail.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Is this a bug that n_tty_set_room not serialized? If so please correct it.
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:46:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FF4F02.2010204@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi experts,

Seems there is an bug related to function n_tty_set_roomin source file
drivers/tty/n_tty.c. This function is used to set receive_room based on
the read_cntby both the consumer and the producer of the tty's read buffer.

But this function is not serialized, so I am afraid there is
a risk like: The producer make the buffer full and then call this 
function to
set the receive_room to 0; while it is preempted by the consumer that empty
the buffer(read_cnt is 0)and then call this very function to set the
receive_room to a non-zero value. But when the producer continue, 
receive_room
was set to 0 again. Thus both read_cnt and receive_room is 0.For consumer
theread_cnt is 0 that no data can be read; while for the producer, thebuffer
is full since the receive_room is 0. Both of them blockhere...

Two methods to avoid it:
A) Addor find a lock to serialize this function;
B) Once the producer find the buffer is full, double check/set the 
buffer with
n_tty_set_room. For example in function "flush_to_ldisc".

Please correct me if I misunderstand something. Or please fix it.

Thanks
Xiao

             reply	other threads:[~2013-01-23  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-23  2:46 snakky.zhang [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-23  4:40 Is this a bug that n_tty_set_room not serialized? If so please correct it snakky.zhang
2013-01-23 14:35 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50FF4F02.2010204@gmail.com \
    --to=snakky.zhang@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox