* Re: [PATCH] regmap: debugfs: Fix compilation warning [not found] <1358779015-25735-1-git-send-email-v-stehle@ti.com> @ 2013-01-22 6:41 ` Mark Brown 2013-01-22 10:07 ` Vincent Stehlé 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Mark Brown @ 2013-01-22 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vincent Stehlé; +Cc: linux-kernel, trivial [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 379 bytes --] On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:36:55PM +0100, Vincent Stehlé wrote: > This fixes the following compilation warning: > - unsigned int i, ret; > + unsigned int i, ret = 0; This sort of fix is not a good idea, you're just shutting the warning up without any sort of analysis explaining why it's generated in error. If it's generating a spurious error that's a compiler bug. [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] regmap: debugfs: Fix compilation warning 2013-01-22 6:41 ` [PATCH] regmap: debugfs: Fix compilation warning Mark Brown @ 2013-01-22 10:07 ` Vincent Stehlé 2013-01-23 15:58 ` Mark Brown 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Vincent Stehlé @ 2013-01-22 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel On 01/22/2013 07:41 AM, Mark Brown wrote: (..) > This sort of fix is not a good idea, you're just shutting the > warning up without any sort of analysis explaining why it's > generated in error. If it's generating a spurious error that's a > compiler bug. In the regmap_debugfs_get_dump_start() function control flow, I think the compiler cannot know for sure that the list_for_each_entry() iterates at least once.: regmap_debugfs_get_dump_start() { unsigned int ret; <snip some code, which does not touch ret> list_for_each_entry() { <snip some code> ret = <value>; } return ret; } Do you think there is a way to "mark" the list_for_each_entry() as iterating at least once? an __attribute__ maybe? Best regards, V. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] regmap: debugfs: Fix compilation warning 2013-01-22 10:07 ` Vincent Stehlé @ 2013-01-23 15:58 ` Mark Brown 2013-01-24 10:12 ` Vincent Stehlé 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Mark Brown @ 2013-01-23 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vincent Stehlé; +Cc: linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 227 bytes --] On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:07:04AM +0100, Vincent Stehlé wrote: > Do you think there is a way to "mark" the list_for_each_entry() as > iterating at least once? an __attribute__ maybe? No - but are you sure that's true? [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] regmap: debugfs: Fix compilation warning 2013-01-23 15:58 ` Mark Brown @ 2013-01-24 10:12 ` Vincent Stehlé 2013-01-26 10:02 ` Mark Brown 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Vincent Stehlé @ 2013-01-24 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel On 01/23/2013 04:58 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:07:04AM +0100, Vincent Stehlé wrote: > >> Do you think there is a way to "mark" the list_for_each_entry() >> as iterating at least once? an __attribute__ maybe? > > No - but are you sure that's true? If you mean "am I sure the loop iterates at least once", then yes, as we have an explicit check just before the concerned list_for_each_entry(): /* * This should never happen; we return above if we fail to * allocate and we should never be in this code if there are * no registers at all. */ if (list_empty(&map->debugfs_off_cache)) { WARN_ON(list_empty(&map->debugfs_off_cache)); return base; } Best regards, V. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] regmap: debugfs: Fix compilation warning 2013-01-24 10:12 ` Vincent Stehlé @ 2013-01-26 10:02 ` Mark Brown 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Mark Brown @ 2013-01-26 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vincent Stehlé; +Cc: linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 471 bytes --] On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:12:24AM +0100, Vincent Stehlé wrote: > If you mean "am I sure the loop iterates at least once", then yes, as > we have an explicit check just before the concerned list_for_each_entry(): So, I hadn't realised this was triggered by a new compiler version - Arnd just tried the same bodge. I've committed a workaround for the compiler which avoids the problems that setting 0 will have and allows the flow analyis to run where it can. [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-26 10:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1358779015-25735-1-git-send-email-v-stehle@ti.com>
2013-01-22 6:41 ` [PATCH] regmap: debugfs: Fix compilation warning Mark Brown
2013-01-22 10:07 ` Vincent Stehlé
2013-01-23 15:58 ` Mark Brown
2013-01-24 10:12 ` Vincent Stehlé
2013-01-26 10:02 ` Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox