From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755643Ab3AYCP6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:15:58 -0500 Received: from intranet.asianux.com ([58.214.24.6]:11493 "EHLO intranet.asianux.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755516Ab3AYCPx (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:15:53 -0500 X-Spam-Score: -100.9 Message-ID: <5101EAD4.9080309@asianux.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:15:48 +0800 From: Chen Gang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu CC: Greg KH , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Consult] Plan: personal contributes plan for 2013 References: <50FFCA59.5070903@asianux.com> <30811.1359070263@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <30811.1359070263@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Valdis Kletnieks: thank you for your reply, firstly. also thank public kernel to provide this additional managerial services to members (for me, "replying member's plan" belongs to managerial services) for "[Consult]" title mails. next time, I should use "Hello all" instead of " Hello 'each real-name' ". (for no one has duty to must reply it, especially every one has his or her own work) 于 2013年01月25日 07:31, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 写道: > Even Dave Miller only averages 12-15 patches a month, and he does it for a > living, and they're all in the one part of the kernel he maintains. ... I guess, one of his main work is for checking and integrating another patches. (also have to spend much time to communicate with many members for their patches) I guess, some of his goal for internal are: to let another members to provide correct contributes (patch should be checked) and also keep them with efficiency and sustainable. > More realistic goal: > > 1) Get a patch accepted. > 2) Get another patch accepted. > 3) Re-evaluate how many patches you can actually do. thank you for your advice. I should be mainly focused on current actions and results. additional consult: does "accepted" means: the patch is applied in "tovalds" or "next-*" tree (another trees are not count) the patch type is "Signed-of-by" (Reported-by, ... are not count) the patch content is for new feature or bug fix (comments, ... are not count) Regards -- Chen Gang Asianux Corporation