From: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: serge.hallyn@canonical.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] userns: Allow the unprivileged users to mount mqueue fs
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:48:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51061F2F.6040104@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bocayntu.fsf@xmission.com>
On 2013/01/28 11:43, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com> writes:
>
>> This patch allow the unprivileged user to mount mqueuefs in
>> user ns.
>>
>> If two userns share the same ipcns,the files in mqueue fs
>> should be seen in both these two userns.
>>
>> If the userns has its own ipcns,it has its own mqueue fs too.
>> ipcns has already done this job well.
>
> I am a little dense. When does userspace actually mount a mqueuefs?
> My impression was that user space never needed to mount and actually
> never could mount a mqueuefs. MS_NO_USER isn't set so mounting a
> mqueuefs is possible but when does it happen and why?
>
Actually the files which representative messgae queue in mqueuefs contains
some informations,such as QSIZE,NOTIFY,SIGNO,NOTIFY_PID.
My workstation is Fedora 17,mqueuefs is mounted on /dev/mqueue by default.
So I think at lest this patch is needed by some people.
Thanks!
Gao
> I am trying to think through the logic here and I think this is safe
> but since I don't understand why we would mount an mqueue fs I am
> having trouble verifying that there are no silly reasons why this might
> be a bad idea.
>
> But from what I can tell so far this seems like a good patch.
>
> Eric
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> ipc/mqueue.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/ipc/mqueue.c b/ipc/mqueue.c
>> index 71a3ca1..023c986 100644
>> --- a/ipc/mqueue.c
>> +++ b/ipc/mqueue.c
>> @@ -1383,6 +1383,7 @@ static struct file_system_type mqueue_fs_type = {
>> .name = "mqueue",
>> .mount = mqueue_mount,
>> .kill_sb = kill_litter_super,
>> + .fs_flags = FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
>> };
>>
>> int mq_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-28 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-28 3:09 [PATCH] userns: Allow the unprivileged users to mount mqueue fs Gao feng
2013-01-28 3:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-28 6:48 ` Gao feng [this message]
2013-01-28 7:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51061F2F.6040104@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox