[PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: TEGRA: Set policy->cpus from driver->init()

[PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: TEGRA: Set policy->cpus from driver->init()

[Viresh Kumar]

For multicore SoC's, with cores sharing clock line, we are required to set
policy->cpus and policy->related_cpus with mask of cpus.

With following patch, we need to set policy->cpus with mask of all possible cpus
and policy->related_cpus would be filled automatically by the cpufreq core.

commit 4948b355e90080cd5ec1e91189f65a01e4186ef2
Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue Jan 29 14:39:08 2013 +0000

    cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()

Current Tegra driver fills only ->related_cpus and not ->cpus, which looks to be
incorrect. Lets fix it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c
index a74d3c7..e7ddcb2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static int tegra_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 300 * 1000;
 
 	policy->shared_type = CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL;
-	cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, cpu_possible_mask);
+	cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpu_possible_mask);
 
 	if (policy->cpu == 0)
 		register_pm_notifier(&tegra_cpu_pm_notifier);
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

[PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: Set all cpus in policy->cpus for single cluster SoCs

[Viresh Kumar]

With following patch, we need to set policy->cpus with mask of all possible cpus
and policy->related_cpus would be filled automatically by the core.

commit 4948b355e90080cd5ec1e91189f65a01e4186ef2
Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue Jan 29 14:39:08 2013 +0000

cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()

Lets fix it for all single cluster SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: spear-devel@list.st.com
---
 drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c  | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c  | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c
index 4f154bc..e12dff6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int __cpuinit db8500_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 20 * 1000; /* in ns */
 
 	/* policy sharing between dual CPUs */
-	cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpu_present_mask);
+	cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
 
 	policy->shared_type = CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL;
 
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c
index 89b178a..d4c4989 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static int maple_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	/* secondary CPUs are tied to the primary one by the
 	 * cpufreq core if in the secondary policy we tell it that
 	 * it actually must be one policy together with all others. */
-	cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask);
+	cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
 	cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(maple_cpu_freqs, policy->cpu);
 
 	return cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy,
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c
index fc714a6..8126084 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int spear_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = spear_cpufreq.transition_latency;
 	policy->cur = spear_cpufreq_get(0);
 
-	cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, topology_core_cpumask(policy->cpu));
+	cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: Set all cpus in policy->cpus for single cluster SoCs

[Viresh Kumar]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 885 bytes --]

On 1 February 2013 12:10, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> With following patch, we need to set policy->cpus with mask of all possible cpus
> and policy->related_cpus would be filled automatically by the core.
>
> commit 4948b355e90080cd5ec1e91189f65a01e4186ef2
> Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Date:   Tue Jan 29 14:39:08 2013 +0000
>
> cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()
>
> Lets fix it for all single cluster SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
> Cc: spear-devel@list.st.com
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c  | 2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c  | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

ARM mail servers are broken, please find patch attached.

[-- Attachment #2: 0002-cpufreq-Set-all-cpus-in-policy-cpus-for-single-clust.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 2929 bytes --]

From e76624720ca471d11ecd45628464d97e9eb513c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <e76624720ca471d11ecd45628464d97e9eb513c9.1359700706.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <1bf82454ab1f16b13212548d7c9605067c8b7a0d.1359700705.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
References: <1bf82454ab1f16b13212548d7c9605067c8b7a0d.1359700705.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:27:59 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: Set all cpus in policy->cpus for single cluster
 SoCs

With following patch, we need to set policy->cpus with mask of all possible cpus
and policy->related_cpus would be filled automatically by the core.

commit 4948b355e90080cd5ec1e91189f65a01e4186ef2
Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue Jan 29 14:39:08 2013 +0000

cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()

Lets fix it for all single cluster SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: spear-devel@list.st.com
---
 drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c  | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c  | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c
index 4f154bc..e12dff6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int __cpuinit db8500_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 20 * 1000; /* in ns */
 
 	/* policy sharing between dual CPUs */
-	cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpu_present_mask);
+	cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
 
 	policy->shared_type = CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL;
 
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c
index 89b178a..d4c4989 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static int maple_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	/* secondary CPUs are tied to the primary one by the
 	 * cpufreq core if in the secondary policy we tell it that
 	 * it actually must be one policy together with all others. */
-	cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask);
+	cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
 	cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(maple_cpu_freqs, policy->cpu);
 
 	return cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy,
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c
index fc714a6..8126084 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/spear-cpufreq.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int spear_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = spear_cpufreq.transition_latency;
 	policy->cur = spear_cpufreq_get(0);
 
-	cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, topology_core_cpumask(policy->cpu));
+	cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

[PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type

[Viresh Kumar]

policy->shared_type field was added only for SoCs with ACPI support:

commit 3b2d99429e3386b6e2ac949fc72486509c8bbe36
Author: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 14 15:05:00 2005 -0500

    P-state software coordination for ACPI core

    http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5737

Many non-ACPI systems are filling this field by mistake, which makes its usage
confusing. Lets clean it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c  | 1 -
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c   | 1 -
 drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c | 2 --
 drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c   | 4 +---
 include/linux/cpufreq.h          | 3 ++-
 5 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c
index e7ddcb2..a36a03d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c
@@ -243,7 +243,6 @@ static int tegra_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	/* FIXME: what's the actual transition time? */
 	policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 300 * 1000;
 
-	policy->shared_type = CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL;
 	cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpu_possible_mask);
 
 	if (policy->cpu == 0)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
index 38ae178..6a538de 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
@@ -146,7 +146,6 @@ static int cpu0_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	 * share the clock and voltage and clock.  Use cpufreq affected_cpus
 	 * interface to have all CPUs scaled together.
 	 */
-	policy->shared_type = CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY;
 	cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
 
 	cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(freq_table, policy->cpu);
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c
index e12dff6..79a8486 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c
@@ -130,8 +130,6 @@ static int __cpuinit db8500_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	/* policy sharing between dual CPUs */
 	cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
 
-	policy->shared_type = CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
index 97102b0..9128c07 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
@@ -214,10 +214,8 @@ static int __cpuinit omap_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	 * interface to handle this scenario. Additional is_smp() check
 	 * is to keep SMP_ON_UP build working.
 	 */
-	if (is_smp()) {
-		policy->shared_type = CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY;
+	if (is_smp())
 		cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
-	}
 
 	/* FIXME: what's the actual transition time? */
 	policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 300 * 1000;
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 6bf3f2d..a22944c 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
 	cpumask_var_t		cpus;	/* Online CPUs only */
 	cpumask_var_t		related_cpus; /* Online + Offline CPUs */
 
-	unsigned int		shared_type; /* ANY or ALL affected CPUs
+	unsigned int		shared_type; /* ACPI: ANY or ALL affected CPUs
 						should set cpufreq */
 	unsigned int		cpu;    /* cpu nr of CPU managing this policy */
 	unsigned int		last_cpu; /* cpu nr of previous CPU that managed
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
 #define CPUFREQ_START			(3)
 #define CPUFREQ_UPDATE_POLICY_CPU	(4)
 
+/* Only for ACPI */
 #define CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_NONE (0) /* None */
 #define CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_HW	 (1) /* HW does needed coordination */
 #define CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL	 (2) /* All dependent CPUs should set freq */
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type

[Viresh Kumar]

On 1 February 2013 12:10, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> policy->shared_type field was added only for SoCs with ACPI support:
>
> commit 3b2d99429e3386b6e2ac949fc72486509c8bbe36
> Author: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> Date:   Wed Dec 14 15:05:00 2005 -0500
>
>     P-state software coordination for ACPI core
>
>     http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5737
>
> Many non-ACPI systems are filling this field by mistake, which makes its usage
> confusing. Lets clean it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c  | 1 -
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c   | 1 -
>  drivers/cpufreq/db8500-cpufreq.c | 2 --
>  drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c   | 4 +---
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h          | 3 ++-
>  5 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

ARM mail servers are broken, please find patch attached.

Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type

[Santosh Shilimkar]

On Friday 01 February 2013 12:10 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> policy->shared_type field was added only for SoCs with ACPI support:
>
> commit 3b2d99429e3386b6e2ac949fc72486509c8bbe36
> Author: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> Date:   Wed Dec 14 15:05:00 2005 -0500
>
>      P-state software coordination for ACPI core
>
>      http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5737
>
> Many non-ACPI systems are filling this field by mistake, which makes its usage
> confusing. Lets clean it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> ---
I haven't looked at the cpufreq code recently but remember
that it was needed to ensure that all the CPU which
share clock/voltage gets updated (affected cpus) on
freq change. The CPUs which needs SW co-ordination, should
have this flag enabled and OMAP was falling in that category.

May be I miss-understood its use, but can you confirm that
SW co-ordination logic continues to work without this flag ?

Regards,
Santosh

Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type

[Viresh Kumar]

On 1 February 2013 12:17, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote:
> I haven't looked at the cpufreq code recently but remember
> that it was needed to ensure that all the CPU which
> share clock/voltage gets updated (affected cpus) on
> freq change. The CPUs which needs SW co-ordination, should
> have this flag enabled and OMAP was falling in that category.

Freq change are done by the target routines of platform cpufreq drivers
and they do something like:

	for_each_cpu(freqs.cpu, policy->cpus)
		cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);

The only requirement from cpufreq core is to keep cpus sharing clock
in policy->cpus.

> May be I miss-understood its use, but can you confirm that
> SW co-ordination logic continues to work without this flag ?

I believe it should work. It works for the systems i worked on:

SPEAr13xx: Dual Cortex A9
ARM TC2: two clusters of A15s and A7s.

Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type

[Santosh Shilimkar]

On Friday 01 February 2013 12:43 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 1 February 2013 12:17, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote:
>> I haven't looked at the cpufreq code recently but remember
>> that it was needed to ensure that all the CPU which
>> share clock/voltage gets updated (affected cpus) on
>> freq change. The CPUs which needs SW co-ordination, should
>> have this flag enabled and OMAP was falling in that category.
>
> Freq change are done by the target routines of platform cpufreq drivers
> and they do something like:
>
> 	for_each_cpu(freqs.cpu, policy->cpus)
> 		cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
>
> The only requirement from cpufreq core is to keep cpus sharing clock
> in policy->cpus.
>
I am not talking about just notifiers. This is for external users who
has subscribed for notifiers. The point is whether the core CPUFReq
gets updated without that flag for all affected CPU.

>> May be I miss-understood its use, but can you confirm that
>> SW co-ordination logic continues to work without this flag ?
>
> I believe it should work. It works for the systems i worked on:
>
> SPEAr13xx: Dual Cortex A9
> ARM TC2: two clusters of A15s and A7s.
>
I will give a try some time next week on OMAP.

Regards
Santosh

Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type

[Viresh Kumar]

On 1 February 2013 13:03, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote:
> I am not talking about just notifiers. This is for external users who
> has subscribed for notifiers. The point is whether the core CPUFReq
> gets updated without that flag for all affected CPU.

Yes, its safe. Follow this thread, yesterday i explained this to Tomasz Figa:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg221629.html

Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type

[Santosh Shilimkar]

On Friday 01 February 2013 01:32 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 1 February 2013 13:03, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote:
>> I am not talking about just notifiers. This is for external users who
>> has subscribed for notifiers. The point is whether the core CPUFReq
>> gets updated without that flag for all affected CPU.
>
> Yes, its safe. Follow this thread, yesterday i explained this to Tomasz Figa:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg221629.html
>
That part was very clear to me Viresh. Anyway thanks for the link.
 From what I read so far, it might just work but I would want to
try it out before acking the approach.

Regards,
Santosh

Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type

[Santosh Shilimkar]

Viresh,

On Friday 01 February 2013 02:22 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2013 01:32 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 1 February 2013 13:03, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>> wrote:
>>> I am not talking about just notifiers. This is for external users who
>>> has subscribed for notifiers. The point is whether the core CPUFReq
>>> gets updated without that flag for all affected CPU.
>>
>> Yes, its safe. Follow this thread, yesterday i explained this to
>> Tomasz Figa:
>>
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg221629.html
>>
> That part was very clear to me Viresh. Anyway thanks for the link.
>  From what I read so far, it might just work but I would want to
> try it out before acking the approach.
>
You are correct. Sorry for oversight on your initial point about the
usage of the flag. When I added that flag, I just went by the
description thinking the cpufreq core booking and stat updates
use the flag. Its not the case.

Thanks for the fix. For the patch,
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: TEGRA: Set policy->cpus from driver->init()

[Viresh Kumar]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 826 bytes --]

On 1 February 2013 12:10, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> For multicore SoC's, with cores sharing clock line, we are required to set
> policy->cpus and policy->related_cpus with mask of cpus.
>
> With following patch, we need to set policy->cpus with mask of all possible cpus
> and policy->related_cpus would be filled automatically by the cpufreq core.
>
> commit 4948b355e90080cd5ec1e91189f65a01e4186ef2
> Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Date:   Tue Jan 29 14:39:08 2013 +0000
>
>     cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()
>
> Current Tegra driver fills only ->related_cpus and not ->cpus, which looks to be
> incorrect. Lets fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>

ARM mail servers are broken, please find patch attached.

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-cpufreq-TEGRA-Set-policy-cpus-from-driver-init.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1654 bytes --]

From 1bf82454ab1f16b13212548d7c9605067c8b7a0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <1bf82454ab1f16b13212548d7c9605067c8b7a0d.1359700705.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:21:49 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: TEGRA: Set policy->cpus from driver->init()

For multicore SoC's, with cores sharing clock line, we are required to set
policy->cpus and policy->related_cpus with mask of cpus.

With following patch, we need to set policy->cpus with mask of all possible cpus
and policy->related_cpus would be filled automatically by the cpufreq core.

commit 4948b355e90080cd5ec1e91189f65a01e4186ef2
Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue Jan 29 14:39:08 2013 +0000

    cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()

Current Tegra driver fills only ->related_cpus and not ->cpus, which looks to be
incorrect. Lets fix it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c
index a74d3c7..e7ddcb2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu-tegra.c
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static int tegra_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 300 * 1000;
 
 	policy->shared_type = CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL;
-	cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, cpu_possible_mask);
+	cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpu_possible_mask);
 
 	if (policy->cpu == 0)
 		register_pm_notifier(&tegra_cpu_pm_notifier);
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: TEGRA: Set policy->cpus from driver->init()

[Stephen Warren]

On 01/31/2013 11:40 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> For multicore SoC's, with cores sharing clock line, we are required to set
> policy->cpus and policy->related_cpus with mask of cpus.
> 
> With following patch, we need to set policy->cpus with mask of all possible cpus
> and policy->related_cpus would be filled automatically by the cpufreq core.
> 
> commit 4948b355e90080cd5ec1e91189f65a01e4186ef2
> Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Date:   Tue Jan 29 14:39:08 2013 +0000
> 
>     cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()
> 
> Current Tegra driver fills only ->related_cpus and not ->cpus, which looks to be
> incorrect. Lets fix it.

Joseph Lo reviewed/tested this and it looks fine, so,

Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>