From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755913Ab3BAIvU (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2013 03:51:20 -0500 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:39325 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755761Ab3BAIvK (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2013 03:51:10 -0500 Message-ID: <510B8237.7030605@ti.com> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 14:22:07 +0530 From: Santosh Shilimkar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Viresh Kumar CC: , , , , , , Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type References: <1bf82454ab1f16b13212548d7c9605067c8b7a0d.1359700705.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <902bed453159832925df76e24806f3b919fdfc74.1359700706.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <510B6510.6060608@ti.com> <510B6FC5.8030309@ti.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 01 February 2013 01:32 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 1 February 2013 13:03, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> I am not talking about just notifiers. This is for external users who >> has subscribed for notifiers. The point is whether the core CPUFReq >> gets updated without that flag for all affected CPU. > > Yes, its safe. Follow this thread, yesterday i explained this to Tomasz Figa: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg221629.html > That part was very clear to me Viresh. Anyway thanks for the link. From what I read so far, it might just work but I would want to try it out before acking the approach. Regards, Santosh