From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>, <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<devel@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] SUNRPC: rework cache upcall to avoid NFSd root
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 09:36:36 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51109A64.8010904@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130204141719.GA815@fieldses.org>
04.02.2013 18:17, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 02:02:29PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> swapping
>>
>> The main idea of this patch set is to call cache request not on kthread
>> upcall, but on userspace daemon cache_read call. This fixes the problem with
>> gaining of wrong dentry path after calling d_path() in kthread root context
>> (svc_export_request() callback), which always work in init root context, but
>> containers can work in "root jail" - i.e. have it's own nested root.
>>
>> v2:
>> 1) NFS DNS cache update wasn't done in the firest version. So this patch set
>> does preparation cleanup of the NFS DNS cache routines.
>> 2) Also, this patch set doesn't remove cache_upcall helper anymore, because
>> it's still required for NFS DNS cache.
>
> Argh--I really prefer incremental patches once I've already committed
> something, but OK.
>
Sorry. I was thinking about incremental patches. Next time I'll do so.
> Backing out the old patches, I'll take a look at these. The first two
> should probably get an ACK from Trond.
>
Trond, could you review first two patches, please?
They are just clean-ups, actually. Nothing special. Required to unify the interfaces for latter patches in the series.
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-05 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-04 11:02 [PATCH v2 0/6] SUNRPC: rework cache upcall to avoid NFSd root Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-04 11:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] NFS: use SUNRPC cache creation and destruction helper for DNS cache Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-08 21:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-04 11:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] NFS; simlify and clean cache library Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-08 21:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-04 11:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] SUNRPC: introduce cache_detail->cache_request callback Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-04 11:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] SUNRPC: rework cache upcall logic Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-04 11:02 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] SUNRPC: remove "cache_request" argument in sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall() function Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-04 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] SUNRPC: move cache_detail->cache_request callback call to cache_read() Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-04 14:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] SUNRPC: rework cache upcall to avoid NFSd root J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-05 5:36 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51109A64.8010904@parallels.com \
--to=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox