From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, <js1304@gmail.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] introduce static_vm for ARM-specific static mapped area
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:32:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5110CA8E.5020606@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360024314-1895-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
On Tuesday 05 February 2013 06:01 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> In current implementation, we used ARM-specific flag, that is,
> VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING, for distinguishing ARM specific static mapped area.
> The purpose of static mapped area is to re-use static mapped area when
> entire physical address range of the ioremap request can be covered
> by this area.
>
> This implementation causes needless overhead for some cases.
> For example, assume that there is only one static mapped area and
> vmlist has 300 areas. Every time we call ioremap, we check 300 areas for
> deciding whether it is matched or not. Moreover, even if there is
> no static mapped area and vmlist has 300 areas, every time we call
> ioremap, we check 300 areas in now.
>
> If we construct a extra list for static mapped area, we can eliminate
> above mentioned overhead.
> With a extra list, if there is one static mapped area,
> we just check only one area and proceed next operation quickly.
>
> In fact, it is not a critical problem, because ioremap is not frequently
> used. But reducing overhead is better idea.
>
> Another reason for doing this work is for removing vm_struct list management,
> entirely. For more information, look at the following link.
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/6/184
>
[..]
>
> Joonsoo Kim (3):
> ARM: vmregion: remove vmregion code entirely
> ARM: ioremap: introduce an infrastructure for static mapped area
> ARM: mm: use static_vm for managing static mapped areas
>
> arch/arm/mm/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
> arch/arm/mm/mm.h | 12 +++
> arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 34 ++++----
> arch/arm/mm/vmregion.c | 205 ------------------------------------------------
> arch/arm/mm/vmregion.h | 31 --------
> 6 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 296 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mm/vmregion.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mm/vmregion.h
>
Nice Clean-up. I tested this series on OMAP which uses few static
mappings. Feel free to add,
Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-05 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-05 0:31 [PATCH v5 0/3] introduce static_vm for ARM-specific static mapped area Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-05 0:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ARM: vmregion: remove vmregion code entirely Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-05 8:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-06 2:08 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-05 0:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] ARM: ioremap: introduce an infrastructure for static mapped area Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-05 4:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-05 0:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: mm: use static_vm for managing static mapped areas Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-05 4:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-05 17:28 ` Rob Herring
2013-02-05 18:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-05 19:12 ` Rob Herring
2013-02-06 2:07 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-06 5:05 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-06 6:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-06 1:41 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-05 9:02 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-02-06 2:09 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] introduce static_vm for ARM-specific static mapped area Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5110CA8E.5020606@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nico@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox