From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757637Ab3BEWXx (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2013 17:23:53 -0500 Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:37924 "EHLO e8.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755964Ab3BEWXv (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2013 17:23:51 -0500 Message-ID: <51118671.7020204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:23:45 -0800 From: Cody P Schafer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Linux MM , David Hansen , LKML , Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] mm: add SECTION_IN_PAGE_FLAGS References: <1358463181-17956-1-git-send-email-cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1358463181-17956-2-git-send-email-cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130201162002.49eadeb7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20130201162002.49eadeb7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13020522-9360-0000-0000-000010335FC3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/01/2013 04:20 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:52:53 -0800 > Cody P Schafer wrote: > >> Instead of directly utilizing a combination of config options to determine this, >> add a macro to specifically address it. >> >> ... >> >> --- a/include/linux/mm.h >> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h >> @@ -625,6 +625,10 @@ static inline pte_t maybe_mkwrite(pte_t pte, struct vm_area_struct *vma) >> #define NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS >> #endif >> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) >> +#define SECTION_IN_PAGE_FLAGS >> +#endif > > We could do this in Kconfig itself, in the definition of a new > CONFIG_SECTION_IN_PAGE_FLAGS. Yep, I only put it here because it "sounds" the similar to NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS, but (of course) NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS isn't defined based on pure dependencies, while this is. > I'm not sure that I like that sort of thing a lot though - it's rather a > pain to have to switch from .[ch] over to Kconfig to find the > definitions of things. I should get off my tail and teach my ctags > scripts to handle this.