public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MODSIGN without RTC?
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 02:06:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5112FE21.4020404@ahsoftware.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5112EA69.6010100@ahsoftware.de>

Am 07.02.2013 00:42, schrieb Alexander Holler:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to try out MODSIGN with kernel 3.7.6 and I've just got hit by:
>
> [    1.346445] X.509: Cert 6a23533cec71c4c52a1618fb4d830e06aa90474e is
> not yet valid
>
> The reason is likely that the (ARM) device in question doesn't have a
> RTC (oh, that topic again ;) ) and gets it's time on boot through NTP.
>
> The used certificate was generated automatically. Having a look at it,
> the following is shown:
>
>         Validity
>              Not Before: Feb  6 02:56:46 2013 GMT
>              Not After : Jan 13 02:56:46 2113 GMT
>
> Without having thought about possible security problems, my first idea
> would be to let the validity start at 1970. As I never did such I never
> had thought about possible implications when doing such (e.g. I don't
> know if someone checks the start date for plausabilitiy)
>
> Another solution would be to retry loading of the certificate if the
> time gets set (and e.g. differs more than a year).
>
> Has someone already thought about how to solve that problem? Or did
> everyone use sane systems which have a (working) RTC?

Another option would be to make a configure option to just ignore the 
date. I'm not sure if I would like to use MODSIGN when I have to fear 
that the machine wouldn't start when the RTC fails or got set to a wrong 
date.

Regards,

Alexander


  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-07  1:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-06 23:42 MODSIGN without RTC? Alexander Holler
2013-02-07  1:06 ` Alexander Holler [this message]
2013-02-07  6:42   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-02-07  7:01     ` Alexander Holler
2013-02-07 10:54       ` Alexander Holler
2013-02-13  9:30       ` Alexander Holler
2013-02-07 18:44   ` Olaf Titz
2013-02-11 19:44     ` Alexander Holler
2013-02-12 13:00       ` Alexander Holler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5112FE21.4020404@ahsoftware.de \
    --to=holler@ahsoftware.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox