From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161005Ab3BGR7e (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:59:34 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:49540 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759261Ab3BGR7c (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:59:32 -0500 Message-ID: <5113EB64.2080002@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:59:00 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ville_Syrj=E4l=E4?= CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add support for 64bit get_user() on x86-32 References: <1355312043-11467-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> <20130207165347.GF9135@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20130207165347.GF9135@intel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/07/2013 08:53 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > Based on the initial response there seems to be some interest towards > it at least. So I'm wondering what's the next step. Is it OK as is, > or does it need more work, or would people want to extend it to include > more of the original work? > > I have quite a lot of other stuff on my plate currently, so it'd > actually be nice if I could find someone to adopt this patch, > especially if there's interest in increasing the scope. > Well, we can put it in and see what happens. It looks good from what I can see. How have you tested it? -hpa