linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] virtio: new API for addition of buffers, scatterlist changes
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 07:35:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51149CC0.4080702@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8738x7ih5o.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>

Il 08/02/2013 05:05, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
>> The virtqueue_add_buf function has two limitations:
>>
>> 1) it requires the caller to provide all the buffers in a single call;
>>
>> 2) it does not support chained scatterlists: the buffers must be
>> provided as an array of struct scatterlist.
>>
>> Because of these limitations, virtio-scsi has to copy each request into
>> a scatterlist internal to the driver.  It cannot just use the one that
>> was prepared by the upper SCSI layers.
> 
> Hi Paulo,
> 
>         Note that you've defined your problem in terms of your solution
> here.  For clarity:

Good catch. :)

> The problem: we want to prepend and append to a scatterlist.  We can't
>         append, because the chained scatterlist implementation requires
>         an element to be appended to join two scatterlists together.
> 
> The solution: fix scatterlists by introducing struct sg_ring:
>         struct sg_ring {
>                 struct list_head ring;
>         	unsigned int nents;
>         	unsigned int orig_nents; /* do we want to replace sg_table? */
>                 struct scatterlist *sg;
>         };
> 
> The workaround: make virtio accept multiple scatterlists for a single
>         buffer.
> 
> There's nothing wrong with your workaround, but if other subsystems have
> the same problem we do, perhaps we should consider a broader solution?

Do they?  Given the resistance you have had on the topic, perhaps they
don't (though I agree that chained scatterlist are horrible).

But I'll add a note on this to the commit message and why the workaround
is IMHO acceptable.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-08  6:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-07 12:22 [RFC PATCH 0/8] virtio: new API for addition of buffers, scatterlist changes Paolo Bonzini
2013-02-07 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] virtio: add functions for piecewise addition of buffers Paolo Bonzini
2013-02-07 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] virtio-blk: reorganize virtblk_add_req Paolo Bonzini
2013-02-07 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] virtio-blk: use virtqueue_start_buf on bio path Paolo Bonzini
2013-02-07 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] virtio-blk: use virtqueue_start_buf on req path Paolo Bonzini
2013-02-07 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] scatterlist: introduce sg_unmark_end Paolo Bonzini
2013-02-07 12:35   ` Jens Axboe
2013-02-07 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] virtio-net: unmark scatterlist ending after virtqueue_add_buf Paolo Bonzini
2013-02-07 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] virtio-scsi: use virtqueue_start_buf Paolo Bonzini
2013-02-07 12:22 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] virtio: reimplement virtqueue_add_buf using new functions Paolo Bonzini
2013-02-07 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] virtio: new API for addition of buffers, scatterlist changes Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-02-07 13:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-02-07 13:23     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-02-07 13:20       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-02-07 13:31         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-02-07 13:30           ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-02-08  4:05 ` Rusty Russell
2013-02-08  6:35   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-02-08 11:52   ` Jens Axboe
2013-02-13  9:46     ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51149CC0.4080702@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).