linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "lkml," <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Denis Turischev <denis@compulab.co.il>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	sameo@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: gpio-sch GPIO_SYSFS access
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:08:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5114A453.8000408@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <511481A2.7010100@linux.intel.com>

On 02/07/2013 08:40 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02/07/2013 02:09 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is it that some other driver has claimed these GPIO lines? If so, how do
>>> I determine which one?
>>
>> Yes I think that could be it, the driver would need to call
>> gpio_export() for it to also be accessible in sysfs.
>>
>> Configure in debugfs and check the file "gpio" in debugfs
>> to figure out the client.
>>
>> Yours,
>> Linus Walleij
>>
> 
> I found gpio_export() as you suggested above and instrumented it. What I
> found was that it was not getting called at all. As I understand it,
> calling gpiochip_export() should make the gpiochip# appear in
> /sys/class/gpio and then I should be able to configure which lines are
> exported via the /sys/class/gpio/export file.
> 
> I haven't yet found how gpio-pch differs from gpio-sch that causes the
> gpio-pch chip to appear in sysfs and the gpio-sch one not to. I did
> patch gpio-sch with a request and export loop:
> 
> $ git diff drivers/gpio/gpio-sch.c
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sch.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sch.c
> index 8cadf4d..79783c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sch.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sch.c
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static struct gpio_chip sch_gpio_resume = {
>  static int __devinit sch_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>         struct resource *res;
> -       int err, id;
> +       int err, id, gpio;
> 
>         id = pdev->id;
>         if (!id)
> @@ -243,10 +243,24 @@ static int __devinit sch_gpio_probe(struct
> platform_device *p
>         if (err < 0)
>                 goto err_sch_gpio_core;
> 
> +       /* DEBUG: export all the core GPIOS */
> +       for (gpio = sch_gpio_core.base;
> +            gpio < sch_gpio_core.base + sch_gpio_core.ngpio; gpio++) {
> +               gpio_request(gpio, "gpio-sch");
> +               gpio_export(gpio, true);
> +       }
> +
>         err = gpiochip_add(&sch_gpio_resume);
>         if (err < 0)
>                 goto err_sch_gpio_resume;
> 
> +       /* DEBUG: export all the resume GPIOS */
> +       for (gpio = sch_gpio_resume.base;
> +            gpio < sch_gpio_resume.base + sch_gpio_resume.ngpio; gpio++) {
> +               gpio_request(gpio, "gpio-sch");
> +               gpio_export(gpio, true);
> +       }
> +
>         return 0;
> 
>  err_sch_gpio_resume:
> 
> 
> With this both the gpiochip# and gpio# entries appear in sysfs. However,
> unlike those for the gpio-pch lines, these report an error in the sysfs
> interface:
> 
> /sys/class/gpio# ls *
> ls: gpio0: No such file or directory
> 

Well, this happens when the driver in question gets removed by another
driver. In this case the mfd/lpc_sch.c driver fails reading some PCI
config after it has added the gpio-pch device to a list:

lpc_sch 0000:00:1f.0: Decode of the WDT I/O range disabled


It then proceeds to remove all the devices it added - including gpio-pch.c.

Dragging Samuel in as his name is on some of the commits, maybe he can
help here.

Samuel, does it make sense for CONFIG_GPIO_SCH to require
CONFIG_LPC_SCH? I'm building for a Queensbay (Atom E6xx + EG20T PCH).
There is no SCH as I understand things. Can these be decoupled?

I should note that if I just refuse to remove the gpio-sch with -EBUSY,
the gpiochip files show up in /sys:

# ls /sys/class/gpio/
export       gpiochip0    gpiochip244  gpiochip5    unexport

and debugfs/gpio shows the sch gpio ranges:

GPIOs 0-4,platform/sch_gpio.33158,sch_gpio_core:
GPIOs 5-13, platform/sch_gpio.33158, sch_gpio_resume:

GPIOs 244-255, 0000:02:00.2:


Unfortunatley, they still fail to export:

# echo 0 > /sys/class/gpio/export
gpio_export: gpio0 status -2
export_store: status -2
sh: write error: No such file or directory

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-08  7:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-07  0:58 gpio-sch GPIO_SYSFS access Darren Hart
2013-02-07 10:09 ` Linus Walleij
2013-02-07 15:17   ` Darren Hart
2013-02-08  0:36   ` Darren Hart
2013-02-08  4:40   ` Darren Hart
2013-02-08  7:08     ` Darren Hart [this message]
2013-02-08  8:49       ` Samuel Ortiz
2013-02-08 10:36         ` Darren Hart
2013-02-08 11:07           ` Samuel Ortiz
2013-02-08 17:43             ` Darren Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5114A453.8000408@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=denis@compulab.co.il \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).