From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761107Ab3BJTpR (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:45:17 -0500 Received: from e23smtp05.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.147]:42020 "EHLO e23smtp05.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752253Ab3BJTpO (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:45:14 -0500 Message-ID: <5117F848.1090700@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 01:13:04 +0530 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com CC: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, namhyung@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@sisk.pl, sbw@mit.edu, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/45] rcu, CPU hotplug: Fix comment referring to stop_machine() References: <20130122073210.13822.50434.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> <20130122073630.13822.99359.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> <20130209001439.GQ2666@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20130209001439.GQ2666@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13021019-1396-0000-0000-00000286239E Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/09/2013 05:44 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:06:34PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: >> Don't refer to stop_machine() in the CPU hotplug path, since we are going >> to get rid of it. Also, move the comment referring to callback adoption >> to the CPU_DEAD case, because that's where it happens now. >> >> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat > > Ouch! That comment is indeed obsolete and must die. > > I queued this to -rcu with your Signed-off-by. However, I omitted > the added comment, as it is imcomplete -- it is easy to look at > rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu() to see what it does. > Cool! I'll drop it from my patch series then. Thank you! Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat