From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
<Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<devel@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] NFSD: fix races in service per-net resources allocation
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:49:12 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5119E5E8.9030803@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130211163715.GA19342@fieldses.org>
11.02.2013 20:37, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:18:18AM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> This one looks a bit complicated and confusing to me. Probably because
>> I'm not that familiar with service transports processing logic. So,
>> as I can see, we now try to run over all per-net pool-assigned
>> transports, remove them from "ready" queue and delete one by one.
>> Then we try to enqueue all temporary sockets. But where in enqueueing
>> of permanent sockets? I.e. how does they be destroyed with this patch?
>> Then we once again try to run over all per-net pool-assigned
>> transports, remove them from "ready" queue and delete one by one. Why
>> twice? I.e. why not just lose them, then enqueue them and
>> svc_clean_up_xprts()?
>
> I think you missed the first svc_close_list?:
>
Yeah, thanks! To many deleted lines confused me.
>>> svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net);
>>> + svc_clean_up_xprts(serv, net);
>>> + svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
>>> + svc_clean_up_xprts(serv, net);
>
> The idea is that before we'd like to close all the listeners first, so
> that they aren't busy creating more tempsocks while we're trying to
> close them.
>
> I overlooked a race, though: if another thread was already handling an
> accept for one of the listeners then it might not get closed by that
> first svc_clean_up_xprts.
>
> I guess we could do something like:
>
> delay = 0;
>
> again:
> numclosed = svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net);
> numclosed += svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
> if (numclosed) {
> svc_clean_up_xprts(serv, net);
> msleep(delay++);
> goto again;
> }
>
> Seems a little cheesy, but if we don't care much about shutdown
> performance in a rare corner case, maybe it's the simplest way out?
>
Agreed. This part (per-net shutdown) has enough logical complexity already and would be great to not
increase it.
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-12 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-01 11:28 [PATCH 0/2] NFSD: fix races in service per-net resources allocation Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-01 11:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] per-cpu semaphores: export symbols to modules Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-01 11:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] SUNRPC: protect transport processing with per-cpu rw semaphore Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-11 0:25 ` [PATCH 0/2] NFSD: fix races in service per-net resources allocation J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-11 6:18 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-11 16:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-11 20:58 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-12 9:52 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-12 20:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-12 21:18 ` Peter Staubach
2013-02-13 5:16 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-02-12 6:49 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5119E5E8.9030803@parallels.com \
--to=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox