linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
	ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Use a bitfield to mask nuisance get_user() warnings
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 23:12:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5119EB71.6080508@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzmWfOQzVMPJUah3oEsn-aaeN5qtO=7P3MQUfLZmEFJZA@mail.gmail.com>

Just to be sure, I re-ran the comparison using gcc 4.6.3 instead of gcc
4.7.2.  With gcc 4.6.3 I consistently get a few hundred bytes longer
with the bitfield variant than with the pre-get_user() baseline.

I looked at some of the diffed disassembly, and the differences seem to
be in the code generated downstream of __get_user_1 and __get_user_2,
which I guess is to be expected, mostly in the form of padding.

Annoyingly enough in *both* cases I found unnecessary instructions like:

+c12f6fbb:      0f b7 d2                movzwl %dx,%edx

	-hpa


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-12  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-12 11:34 [PATCH] x86: Add support for 64bit get_user() on x86-32 ville.syrjala
2012-12-12 16:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-12 16:32   ` Ville Syrjälä
2012-12-12 16:45     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-07 16:53 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-02-07 17:59   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-08 16:24     ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-02-08 17:30       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-08 18:23         ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-02-08 19:08           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-09 10:41             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-09 11:00               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-12  1:37                 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Use a bitfield to mask nuisance get_user() warnings tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12  3:33                   ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12  4:21                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12  4:42                       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12  4:47                         ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12  4:51                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12  7:12                           ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-02-12  8:10                       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-12 16:38                       ` H.J. Lu
2013-02-12 17:00                         ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12 17:14                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12 17:30                             ` H.J. Lu
2013-02-12 18:25                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12 18:29                                 ` H.J. Lu
2013-02-12 18:46                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12 18:58                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12 20:55                                 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Redesign get_user with a __builtin_choose_expr hack tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12 23:06                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12 23:19                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12 23:49                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12 23:52                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-13  0:01                                       ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, doc: Clarify the use of asm("%edx") in uaccess.h tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12 23:21                                     ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Redesign get_user with a __builtin_choose_expr hack Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-12 17:32                             ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Use a bitfield to mask nuisance get_user() warnings Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12 17:35                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12 17:49                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12 17:57                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5119EB71.6080508@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).