From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Should SPARC use cpuidle?
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:03:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511A83D8.7020202@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <511A837B.8020804@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 337 bytes --]
>> Can you please move the definition of sparc_idle to processor_32.h
>> It is sparc32 specific - and then we do not need the __ASSEMBLY__ guards
>> as the sparc32 variant are not used from assembler.
>
> sure, let me know if attached works.
ugh, not accustomed to sending patches via thunderbird.
hopefully this attachment works...
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-sparc-idle-rename-pm_idle-to-sparc_idle.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 4055 bytes --]
>From 358ca5d7e02c4559ad3fbf8135421e4a3753e979 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 23:27:26 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] sparc idle: rename pm_idle to sparc_idle
Reply-To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Organization: Intel Open Source Technology Center
(pm_idle)() is being removed from linux/pm.h
because Linux does not have such a cross-architecture concept.
sparc uses an idle function pointer in its architecture
specific code. So we re-name sparc use of pm_idle to sparc_idle.
Maybe some day, SPARC will cut over to cpuidle...
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_32.h | 1 +
arch/sparc/kernel/apc.c | 3 ++-
arch/sparc/kernel/leon_pmc.c | 5 +++--
arch/sparc/kernel/pmc.c | 3 ++-
arch/sparc/kernel/process_32.c | 7 +++----
5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_32.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_32.h
index c1e0191..2c7baa4 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_32.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_32.h
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ extern unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *);
extern struct task_struct *last_task_used_math;
#define cpu_relax() barrier()
+extern void (*sparc_idle)(void);
#endif
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/apc.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/apc.c
index 348fa1a..eefda32 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/apc.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/apc.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/auxio.h>
#include <asm/apc.h>
+#include <asm/processor.h>
/* Debugging
*
@@ -158,7 +159,7 @@ static int apc_probe(struct platform_device *op)
/* Assign power management IDLE handler */
if (!apc_no_idle)
- pm_idle = apc_swift_idle;
+ sparc_idle = apc_swift_idle;
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: power management initialized%s\n",
APC_DEVNAME, apc_no_idle ? " (CPU idle disabled)" : "");
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/leon_pmc.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/leon_pmc.c
index 4e17432..708bca4 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/leon_pmc.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/leon_pmc.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <asm/leon_amba.h>
#include <asm/cpu_type.h>
#include <asm/leon.h>
+#include <asm/processor.h>
/* List of Systems that need fixup instructions around power-down instruction */
unsigned int pmc_leon_fixup_ids[] = {
@@ -69,9 +70,9 @@ static int __init leon_pmc_install(void)
if (sparc_cpu_model == sparc_leon) {
/* Assign power management IDLE handler */
if (pmc_leon_need_fixup())
- pm_idle = pmc_leon_idle_fixup;
+ sparc_idle = pmc_leon_idle_fixup;
else
- pm_idle = pmc_leon_idle;
+ sparc_idle = pmc_leon_idle;
printk(KERN_INFO "leon: power management initialized\n");
}
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pmc.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pmc.c
index dcbb62f..8b7297f 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pmc.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pmc.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <asm/oplib.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/auxio.h>
+#include <asm/processor.h>
/* Debug
*
@@ -63,7 +64,7 @@ static int pmc_probe(struct platform_device *op)
#ifndef PMC_NO_IDLE
/* Assign power management IDLE handler */
- pm_idle = pmc_swift_idle;
+ sparc_idle = pmc_swift_idle;
#endif
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: power management initialized\n", PMC_DEVNAME);
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/process_32.c
index be8e862..62eede1 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/process_32.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -43,8 +43,7 @@
* Power management idle function
* Set in pm platform drivers (apc.c and pmc.c)
*/
-void (*pm_idle)(void);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(pm_idle);
+void (*sparc_idle)(void);
/*
* Power-off handler instantiation for pm.h compliance
@@ -75,8 +74,8 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
/* endless idle loop with no priority at all */
for (;;) {
while (!need_resched()) {
- if (pm_idle)
- (*pm_idle)();
+ if (sparc_idle)
+ (*sparc_idle)();
else
cpu_relax();
}
--
1.8.1.3.535.ga923c31
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-12 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-11 7:34 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-11 18:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-11 23:23 ` Len Brown
2013-02-12 17:35 ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-02-12 18:01 ` Should SPARC use cpuidle? (was: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related)) Len Brown
2013-02-12 18:03 ` Len Brown [this message]
2013-02-12 19:36 ` Should SPARC use cpuidle? Sam Ravnborg
2013-02-12 19:42 ` Should SPARC use cpuidle? (was: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related)) Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=511A83D8.7020202@kernel.org \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox