From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760034Ab3BMQiK (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:38:10 -0500 Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]:35389 "EHLO mail-ie0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759377Ab3BMQiI (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:38:08 -0500 Message-ID: <511BC16C.7040807@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:38:04 -0800 From: Dirk Brandewie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add P state driver for Intel Core Processors References: <1360170133-5066-1-git-send-email-dirk.brandewie@gmail.com> <20130212214949.GA1003@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130212214949.GA1003@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dave, On 02/12/2013 01:49 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 09:02:07AM -0800, dirk.brandewie@gmail.com wrote: > > Won't you also need to patch drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c to not load > on the processors that you want this driver to run on ? > > Dave > For the case where both are built-in the load order works my driver uses device_initcall() and acpi_cpufreq uses late_initcall(). For the case where both are a module (which I was sure I tested) you are right I will have to do something. For now I propose to make my driver built-in only while I sort out the right solution for the module build. Does this seem reasonable to everyone? --Dirk