From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759770Ab3BNOZJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:25:09 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:43034 "EHLO mail-oa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753973Ab3BNOZH (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:25:07 -0500 Message-ID: <511CF3C0.5010409@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:25:04 -0600 From: Rob Herring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Anderson CC: Olof Johansson , arm@kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Rob Herring , Kukjin Kim , Russell King , Thomas Gleixner , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: exynos: move exynos4210-combiner to drivers/irqchip References: <1360706692-13622-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <20130212225227.GA24096@quad.lixom.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/13/2013 12:51 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Rob / Olof, > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 04:04:52PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >>> From: Rob Herring >>> >>> Exynos boot is broken with commit 0529e315 (ARM: use common irqchip_init >>> for GIC init). This commit split the irqchip initialization into 2 calls >>> to of_irq_init. This does not work because of_irq_init requires interrupt >>> parents to be in the match list. >>> >>> Rather than reverting exynos changes, make it do the proper thing by using >>> IRQCHIP_DECLARE. This requires moving the combiner code to drivers/irqchip. >>> >>> Reported-by: Doug Anderson >>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring >>> Cc: Kukjin Kim >>> Cc: Russell King >>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner >>> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org >>> --- >>> >>> I thought there may be other platforms broken in the same way, but I >>> checked and exynos is the only one. >>> >>> This is based on my gic/vic irqchip branch in arm-soc. >> >> Applied to next/cleanup. > > I synced up to next-20130213 and the problem is fixed. :) ...that > label doesn't exactly boot but the problems are unrelated to this > problem now (there are problems with the OF conversions to raw > spinlocks)... > That should be fixed, but may not be in -next yet. It is in Grant's tree. Rob > I haven't done any review of this code (I'm assuming that Olof already > looked it over and Samsung engineers will give it a thorough review), > but it's definitely tested. :) > > Tested-by: Doug Anderson > > Thanks! > > -Doug >