From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make PTRACE_GETREGSET return 32-bit regs if 64-bit process entered kernel with int 80
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:26:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511D104A.1040204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130214150046.GA30543@redhat.com>
On 02/14/2013 04:00 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/14, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> This patch makes it so that in syscall-entry-stop caused by
>> "int 80" instruction, PTRACE_GETREGSET returns 32-bit regset.
>
> Not sure...
>
> First of all, this is incompatible change. And to me, it doesn't look
> correct anyway. Say, why the debugger can't modify r15 if a 64bit tracee
> does int80?
On x86_64, PTRACE_GET/SETREGS can be used for this: they always operate
on 64-bit registers.
> Or think about PTRACE_EVENT_FORK which can be reported with
> TS_COMPAT set.
I don't see a problem. Yes, PTRACE_GETREGSET will return
32-bit regset in this ptrace-stop, which is a problem... why?
> Probably is_ia32_task() should be reported "explicitely" as we already
> discussed, and afaik you have other ideas.
Yes, there are a few ideas. Say, new ptrace op:
can be introduced to return a vector of longs.
To make it easily parsable, how about (type,len,data...)
records? This also may allow tracer to indicate which records
it wants: for example, not everyone wants to read syscall params.
Maybe something like
ptrace(PTRACE_GETSYSCALL, pid, list_of_elements_I_want, &iov)
where list_of_elements_I_want is long[], 0-terminated,
iov points to a buffer, and on return iov.len is updated
(a-la GETREGSET).
What problems can be solved here?
(1) syscall entry/exit discrimination etc. Say, a record
can contain bit flags, such as "it's a syscall entry",
"it's a syscall exit", "it's a group-stop" etc.
Currently, it is impossible for tracer to distinguish
syscall entry from syscall exit.
(2) a record can supply arch-specific data, such as the x86-specific
problem I tried to address: "was it a int 80 syscall?". Variable-length
record format makes it easy to adapt to different archs' needs.
Alternatively, we can set aside a few bits in "bit flags record"
as arch dependent bits. Most arches need just a few bits.
(3) on syscall entry, a record can contain (up to) 7 words: syscall_no
and 0-6 params, making tracer's code less architecture dependent.
Today in strace, *every* architecture needs to have arch-dependent
regs-to-params conversion code. I would like to be able
to code it in C with the same code for most arches.
(4) We can read structs/data pointed by syscall params, such as
struct stat returned by fstat, without needing additional
round-trip to kernel, *and* with kernel-supplied information
on structure's size. Currently, strace has to know the size correctly.
There were, and will be, bugs in strace where we mishandle
structures because we mis-detect process' bitness, and use wrong
struct stat layouts. If kernel would be able to tell us:
"I returned 78 byte structure in memory pointed to by arg1",
it would help a lot. Even if it wouldn't return the result
structure itself (I imagine it's a lot of work in kernel
to access it in other process vm), knowing its size
will still be a big help.
(5) We can read several regsets: gps, SSE regs, etc.
Maybe someone would find it useful? (strace doesn't need this).
How does this look?
I propose to start small, by implementing just 1; 2 in a form of arch bits
as part of 1; and 3. It will satisfy the needs I tried to address
in my patch.
--
vda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-14 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-14 13:17 [PATCH] x86: make PTRACE_GETREGSET return 32-bit regs if 64-bit process entered kernel with int 80 Denys Vlasenko
2013-02-14 15:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-14 16:26 ` Denys Vlasenko [this message]
2013-02-14 18:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-14 19:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-14 19:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-14 20:55 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-02-15 14:50 ` Denys Vlasenko
2013-02-15 14:56 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-02-15 15:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-15 15:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-02-15 15:42 ` Denys Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=511D104A.1040204@redhat.com \
--to=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox