From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: fix cgroup_path() vs rename() race
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 15:59:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511F3C6B.30604@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <511547EA.4090902@gmail.com>
(sorry for the late reply, just came back from holiday)
On 2013/2/9 2:46, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 01/25/2013 02:09 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
>> rename() will change dentry->d_name. The result of this race can
>> be worse than seeing partially rewritten name, but we might access
>> a stale pointer because rename() will re-allocate memory to hold
>> a longer name.
>>
>> Use dentry_path_raw(), and this vfs API will take care of lockings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
>
> Hi Li,
>
> I was fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest, and stumbled on
> a lockdep spew related to this patch.
>
> Here's the spew (brace yourself):
>
dentry_path_raw() will grab rename_lock and dentry->d_lock without disabling
irq, which means cgroup_path() can't be called if the caller has already held
a spinlock with irq disabled.
Both blkio cgroup and cpu cgroup have this lock issue...The only fix is to
make a copy of dentry->d_name and save it in cgrp->name.
Patch will be followed.
> [ 313.262599] ======================================================
> [ 313.271340] [ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ]
> [ 313.277542] 3.8.0-rc6-next-20130208-sasha-00028-ge4e162d #278 Tainted: G W
> [ 313.277542] ------------------------------------------------------
> [ 313.277542] kworker/u:3/4490 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
> [ 313.277542] (rename_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff812a11f9>] dentry_path_raw+0x29/0x70
> [ 313.277542]
> [ 313.277542] and this task is already holding:
> [ 313.277542] (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff819e78f3>] put_io_context_active+0x63/0x100
> [ 313.277542] which would create a new lock dependency:
> [ 313.277542] (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-...} -> (rename_lock){+.+...}
> [ 313.277542]
> [ 313.277542] but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock:
> [ 313.277542] (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-...}
> ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at:
>
...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-16 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-25 7:09 [PATCH] cgroup: fix cgroup_path() vs rename() race Li Zefan
2013-01-25 16:42 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-26 0:20 ` Li Zefan
2013-02-08 18:46 ` Sasha Levin
2013-02-16 7:59 ` Li Zefan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=511F3C6B.30604@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox