From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932441Ab3BSKVL (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:21:11 -0500 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:42758 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932209Ab3BSKVJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:21:09 -0500 Message-ID: <5123524A.9080300@ti.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:52:02 +0530 From: Santosh Shilimkar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Afzal Mohammed CC: , , , , , Russell King , Tony Lindgren , Marc Zyngier , Nicolas Pitre , Will Deacon , Linus Walleij , Rob Herring , Grant Likely , Rob Landley , Sekhar Nori , Syed Mohammed Khasim Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/8] ARM: localtimer: return percpu clkevt on register References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 18 February 2013 05:06 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote: > Return percpu clock event on local timer register. It is the boot cpu > that calls this and it can use the returned percpu clock event to > register a clock event in the case of SMP configuration with one core. SMP configuration with 1 core is UP :-) Jokes apart as said already, lets see whether we really need it. Regards, Santosh