public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Cc: Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: False-positive RCU stall warnings on large systems...
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:34:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5123A984.4000704@numascale-asia.com> (raw)

Hi Paul,

On some of our larger servers with many hundreds of cores and when under 
high duress, we can see scheduler RCU stall warnings [1], so find we 
have to increase the hardcoded RCU_STALL_RAT_DELAY up from 2 and 
RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS up from 3.

Is there a more sustainable way to account for this to avoid it being 
hard-coded, such as making it and dependent timeouts a fraction of 
CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT?

On the other hand, perhaps this is just caused by clock jitter (eg due 
to distance from a contended clock source)? So increasing these a bit 
may just be adequate in general...

Many thanks,
   Daniel

--- [1]

[ 3939.010085] INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} 
(detected by 1, t=29662 jiffies, g=3053, c=3052, q=598)
[ 3939.020008] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
-- 
Daniel J Blueman
Principal Software Engineer, Numascale Asia

             reply	other threads:[~2013-02-19 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-19 16:34 Daniel J Blueman [this message]
2013-02-19 18:16 ` False-positive RCU stall warnings on large systems Paul E. McKenney
2013-02-20  3:35   ` Daniel J Blueman
2013-02-25 16:32     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-05  9:02       ` Daniel J Blueman
2013-03-06 17:03         ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5123A984.4000704@numascale-asia.com \
    --to=daniel@numascale-asia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
    --cc=sp@numascale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox