From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934404Ab3BTRyr (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:54:47 -0500 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:46497 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933919Ab3BTRyp (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:54:45 -0500 Message-ID: <51250DDE.7010408@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:54:38 -0700 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King CC: Hiroshi Doyu , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] memory: tegra_ahb_enable_smmu() depends on TEGRA_IOMMU_SMMU References: <1360175666-8377-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com><5112A642.1020800@wwwdotorg.org><20130206.211635.744922728615926717.hdoyu@nvidia.com> <20130211.193034.1346903263789032239.hdoyu@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <20130211.193034.1346903263789032239.hdoyu@nvidia.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/11/2013 10:30 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > Hiroshi Doyu wrote @ Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:16:35 +0200 (EET): > >> Hi Russell, >> >> Stephen Warren wrote @ Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:51:46 +0100: >> >>> On 02/06/2013 11:34 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: >>>> New SoC, Tegra114 also uses SMMU. Change tegra_ahb_enable_smmu()'s >>>> dependency from ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC to TEGRA_IOMMU_SMMU. No need to edit >>>> whenever a new Tegra SoC comes. >>>> >>>> The following combination caused build error, which this patch fixes. >>>> >>>> CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC=y >>>> \# CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC is not set >>>> CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_114_SOC=y >>>> >>>> drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c:485: undefined reference to 'tegra_ahb_enable_smmu' >>> >>> Tested-by: Stephen Warren >>> >>> Russell, I assume Hiroshi should upload this to your patch tracker? It's >>> needed for 3.9. >> >> FYI: Submitted as: >> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=7640/1 > > Russell, > > Is the above ok for you? > Please let me know if still I need to do something. Russell, will this patch make it into your tree for 3.9? Do you think it should go through some other tree? Thanks.