public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	giancarlo.asnaghi@st.com, ciminaghi@gnudd.com,
	alan@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/5] drivers/amba: add support for a PCI bridge
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:50:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51255329.4070506@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130220224528.GA24819@mail.gnudd.com>

On 02/20/2013 02:45 PM, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> [meanwhile I posted V6 with the acked-by of linusw and others, that
> were missing in V5]
> 
> rmk:
>>> I'm happy to take it through my tree if everyone is now happy with this.
> 
> hpa: 
>> I am okay with that, although I would like to make sure we do a bunch of
>> x86 randconfigs on it before pushing it to Linus.
> 
> I did like this:
>   - disable STA2X11 (and thus AMBA) and build
>   - enable STA2X11, answer y to all new questions and build
> 
> So there's nothing left (you'll have two unrelated warnings, that I'm
> working on and I'll post a fix tomorrow).  Sure, Peter, first time I
> didn't do that test and missed some of the drivers.
> 

I was just concerned that rmk wouldn't necessarily do those tests as a
matter of process.

So Russell -- how do you want to handle this?  Should I take them (and
ask Ingo to put them through his test machinery) or do you want to (and
run x86 randconfigs as part of your testing)?

	-hpa



  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-20 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-20 21:22 [PATCH V5 0/5] x86: a bridge from PCI to AMBA Alessandro Rubini
2013-02-20 21:23 ` [PATCH V5 1/5] DMA: PL330: use prefix in reg names to build under x86 Alessandro Rubini
2013-02-20 21:23 ` [PATCH V5 2/5] watchdog: sp805_wdt depends on ARM Alessandro Rubini
2013-02-20 21:23 ` [PATCH V5 3/5] mmc: Use the new <linux/sizes.h> Alessandro Rubini
2013-02-20 21:24 ` [PATCH V5 4/5] drivers/amba: add support for a PCI bridge Alessandro Rubini
2013-02-20 22:24   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-20 22:33     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-20 22:45       ` Alessandro Rubini
2013-02-20 22:50         ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-02-20 23:35           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-20 23:37             ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-20 21:24 ` [PATCH V5 5/5] x86: add CONFIG_ARM_AMBA, selected by STA2X11 Alessandro Rubini
2013-02-20 21:58 ` [PATCH V5 0/5] x86: a bridge from PCI to AMBA H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51255329.4070506@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ciminaghi@gnudd.com \
    --cc=giancarlo.asnaghi@st.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rubini@gnudd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox