From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263805AbTKKXLU (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:11:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263808AbTKKXLU (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:11:20 -0500 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.105]:50073 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263805AbTKKXLO (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:11:14 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:36:14 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Andrew Morton cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, ak@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] zero out i_blocks in get_pipe_inode Message-ID: <51260000.1068593774@flay> In-Reply-To: <20031111144842.137e396e.akpm@osdl.org> References: <44940000.1068591898@flay> <20031111144842.137e396e.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> + inode->i_blocks = 0; > > alloc_inode() already did that. Sigh ... yes, you're right - sorry. get_pipe_inode -> new_inode -> alloc_inode. definitely covered. I shall crawl back under my regularly scheduled stone ;-) M.