From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
alex.shi@intel.com, Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair()
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:10:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51273609.9080308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361521270.26780.34.camel@laptop>
On 02/22/2013 04:21 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 10:36 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>> According to my understanding, in the old world, wake_affine() will
>> only
>> be used if curr_cpu and prev_cpu share cache, which means they are in
>> one package, whatever search in llc sd of curr_cpu or prev_cpu, we
>> won't
>> have the chance to spread the task out of that package.
>
> Nah, look at where SD_WAKE_AFFINE is set. Only 'remote/big' NUMA domains
> don't have it set, but 'small' NUMA systems will have it set over the
> entire domain tree.
Oh, I missed that point...
But I don't get the reason to make NUMA level affine, cpus in different
nodes share cache? doesn't make sense...
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-22 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 9:08 [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair() Michael Wang
2013-01-29 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] sched: schedule balance map foundation Michael Wang
2013-02-20 13:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-21 4:52 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-20 13:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-21 4:58 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 11:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 2:53 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 3:33 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-22 4:19 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 4:46 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-22 5:05 ` Michael Wang
2013-01-29 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] sched: build schedule balance map Michael Wang
2013-01-29 9:10 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] sched: simplify select_task_rq_fair() with " Michael Wang
2013-02-18 5:52 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair() Michael Wang
2013-02-20 10:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-20 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-20 14:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-21 5:21 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 5:14 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 4:51 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 6:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-21 7:00 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 8:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-21 9:08 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 9:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 2:36 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 5:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 5:26 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 6:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 6:42 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 8:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 8:35 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 9:10 ` Michael Wang [this message]
2013-02-22 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 9:58 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 9:20 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-21 10:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 2:37 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 5:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 6:06 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 6:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 8:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 9:11 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 9:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-22 10:08 ` Michael Wang
2013-02-22 9:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-22 10:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 12:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-22 12:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 13:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-22 14:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-22 14:42 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51273609.9080308@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).