From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758480Ab3BVRIC (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:08:02 -0500 Received: from mx0.parallels.com ([199.115.104.20]:37892 "EHLO mx0.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758429Ab3BVRIA (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:08:00 -0500 Message-ID: <5127A607.3040603@parallels.com> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:08:23 +0400 From: Glauber Costa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter CC: , , , Andrew Morton , "Tejun Heo" , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slub: correctly bootstrap boot caches References: <1361550000-14173-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <0000013d02d9ee83-9b41b446-ee42-4498-863e-33b3175c007c-000000@email.amazonses.com> In-Reply-To: <0000013d02d9ee83-9b41b446-ee42-4498-863e-33b3175c007c-000000@email.amazonses.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [46.39.244.6] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Argh. This one was the final version: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/ > It seems it would work. It is all the same to me. Which one do you prefer?