Re: [PATCH 2/3] cgroup: add cgroup_name() API

Tejun Heo
2013-03-04T17:38:31Z

Hello,

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:02:37AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > Yeah, that's what I meant by the "anal" part although it seems like
> > c99 doesn't even allow that. Do we care tho? It seems like a logical
> > feature which should show up in the standard eventually. Maybe it
> > could be a problem for clang?
> >
>
> Do we have a decision now? Please pick v4 if this GNU extension can't be used
> in kernel code, otherwise v5.

I'm just gonna apply the one with the initializer. It's simpler and
not like we can't back out easily if it ever becomes a problem.

Thanks.

--
tejun