From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, clocksource, fix !CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG compile
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:01:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <512B7CD3.8070904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1302222111400.22263@ionos>
On 02/22/2013 03:14 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>> If I explicitly disable the clocksource watchdog in the x86 Kconfig,
>> the x86 kernel will not compile unless this is properly defined.
>
> You shouldn't do that. :)
>
>> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
>> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: x86@kernel.org
>> ---
>> kernel/time/clocksource.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
>> index c958338..e04821f 100644
>> --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
>> +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
>> @@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ static void clocksource_enqueue_watchdog(struct clocksource *cs)
>> static inline void clocksource_dequeue_watchdog(struct clocksource *cs) { }
>> static inline void clocksource_resume_watchdog(void) { }
>> static inline int clocksource_watchdog_kthread(void *data) { return 0; }
>> +void clocksource_mark_unstable(struct clocksource *cs) { }
>
> Unless this is defined as
>
>> +static inline void clocksource_mark_unstable(struct clocksource *cs) { }
>
> Right?
Thomas,
Actually that needs to be "void clocksource_mark_unstable()" as it is exported
in include/linux/clocksource.h as such.
The other static inline functions above it are only used in clocksource.c.
So I think my patch is correct ...
P.
>
> tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-25 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-22 20:08 [PATCH] x86, clocksource, fix !CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG compile Prarit Bhargava
2013-02-22 20:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-24 17:04 ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-02-25 14:21 ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-02-25 15:01 ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2013-05-27 10:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-05-27 14:37 ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-05-27 15:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-07-22 23:01 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=512B7CD3.8070904@redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).