From: Don Morris <don.morris@hp.com>
To: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com, tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node!
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:27:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <512BD753.4080001@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <512B8407.2090807@canonical.com>
On 02/25/2013 10:32 AM, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 02/25/2013 08:02 AM, Tim Gardner wrote:
>> Is this an expected warning ? I'll boot a vanilla kernel just to be sure.
>>
>> rebased against ab7826595e9ec51a51f622c5fc91e2f59440481a in Linus' repo:
>>
>
> Same with a vanilla kernel, so it doesn't appear that any Ubuntu cruft
> is having an impact:
Reproduced on a HP z620 workstation (E5-2620 instead of E5-2680, but
still Sandy Bridge, though I don't think that matters).
Bisection leads to:
# bad: [e8d1955258091e4c92d5a975ebd7fd8a98f5d30f] acpi, memory-hotplug:
parse SRAT before memblock is ready
Nothing terribly obvious leaps out as to *why* that reshuffling messes
up the cpu<-->node bindings, but I wanted to put this out there while
I poke around further. [Note that the SRAT: PXM -> APIC -> Node print
outs during boot are the same either way -- if you look at the APIC
numbers of the processors (from /proc/cpuinfo), the processors should
be assigned to the correct node, but they aren't.] cc'ing Tang Chen
in case this is obvious to him or he's already fixed it somewhere not
on Linus's tree yet.
Don Morris
>
> [ 0.170435] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 0.170450] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:324
> topology_sane.isra.2+0x71/0x84()
> [ 0.170452] Hardware name: S2600CP
> [ 0.170454] sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same
> node! [node: 1 != 0]. Ignoring dependency.
> [ 0.156000] smpboot: Booting Node 1, Processors #1
> [ 0.170455] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.170460] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.8.0+ #1
> [ 0.170461] Call Trace:
> [ 0.170466] [<ffffffff810597bf>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
> [ 0.170473] [<ffffffff810598b6>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
> [ 0.170477] [<ffffffff816cc752>] topology_sane.isra.2+0x71/0x84
> [ 0.170482] [<ffffffff816cc9de>] set_cpu_sibling_map+0x23f/0x436
> [ 0.170487] [<ffffffff816ccd0c>] start_secondary+0x137/0x201
> [ 0.170502] ---[ end trace 09222f596307ca1d ]---
>
> rtg
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-25 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-25 15:02 sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node! Tim Gardner
2013-02-25 15:32 ` Tim Gardner
2013-02-25 21:27 ` Don Morris [this message]
2013-02-25 22:50 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-26 0:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-26 2:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-26 3:21 ` Martin Bligh
2013-02-26 4:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-26 4:51 ` Martin Bligh
2013-02-26 6:09 ` Tang Chen
2013-02-26 6:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-26 7:29 ` Tang Chen
2013-02-26 7:53 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-01 6:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-03-01 8:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-01 10:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-01 11:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-01 11:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-03-01 15:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-26 1:51 ` Tang Chen
2013-02-26 21:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-26 22:44 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 0:52 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-02-27 2:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 3:38 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-02-27 4:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 4:43 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-02-27 5:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 5:49 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-02-27 6:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 7:11 ` Tang Chen
2013-02-27 7:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 7:44 ` Tang Chen
2013-02-28 16:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-01 1:39 ` Tang Chen
2013-02-27 8:00 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-27 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-28 10:01 ` Tang Chen
2013-03-01 3:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-01 3:46 ` Tang Chen
2013-03-01 4:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-01 4:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <CAE9FiQXb7K=QTR4PgMdNSoPm2LgYkxAuXUUZ0BXtgicQOGOaUA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-03-01 6:02 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-01 7:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-01 15:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-03-01 22:51 ` [PATCH] x86, ACPI, mm: Revert movablemem_map support Yinghai Lu
2013-03-01 6:18 ` sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node! Tang Chen
2013-03-01 8:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-01 8:39 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-03-01 7:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-01 11:32 ` Tang Chen
2013-03-01 19:31 ` Yinghai Lu
[not found] ` <CAD11hGx5N9Eqy5bX-SEv9c7oR6Ehz2pUJwdrK0Q=L4S44RC5gg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-03-02 5:46 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-01 4:40 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-27 12:40 ` Don Morris
2013-02-27 16:28 ` Luck, Tony
2013-02-27 17:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 17:50 ` Luck, Tony
2013-02-27 2:14 ` Tang Chen
2013-02-27 2:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-27 4:32 ` Tang Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=512BD753.4080001@hp.com \
--to=don.morris@hp.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox