From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759749Ab3BZSgx (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:36:53 -0500 Received: from mail.tpi.com ([70.99.223.143]:2442 "EHLO mail.tpi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756521Ab3BZSgw (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:36:52 -0500 Message-ID: <512D00BE.8090204@canonical.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:36:46 -0700 From: Tim Gardner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mgreer@animalcreek.com CC: herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: crypto: omap-sham, omap-aes and dma_request_slave_channel_compat() X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Whats up with commits 0e87e73f4abe1ada69cf780fe2550c6361a1b53b and b4b87a934c30fb91cbdd18ae028acdc361e1cf0f. As far as I can tell, dma_request_slave_channel_compat() does not exist in 3.9 as of 52caa59ed335616c5254adff7911465a57ed9f14, nor does it exist in linux-next as of Feb 26. Am I just being dense ? Reverting those 2 commits at least allows the compile complete. rtg -- Tim Gardner tim.gardner@canonical.com