From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750919Ab3B0FDH (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:03:07 -0500 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:47731 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750699Ab3B0FDG (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:03:06 -0500 Message-ID: <512D93D5.3010501@ti.com> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:34:21 +0530 From: Santosh Shilimkar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Viresh Kumar CC: Daniel Lezcano , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: timer-sp: Set dynamic irq affinity References: <1361917047-29230-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1361917047-29230-5-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <512D91E8.6050706@ti.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 27 February 2013 10:29 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 27 February 2013 10:26, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Wednesday 27 February 2013 03:47 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> >>> From: Viresh Kumar >>> >>> When a cpu goes to a deep idle state where its local timer is shutdown, it >>> notifies the time frame work to use the broadcast timer instead. >>> >>> Unfortunately, the broadcast device could wake up any CPU, including an >>> idle one >>> which is not concerned by the wake up at all. >>> >> Broad-cast device will only open the CPU for which the timer IRQ >> affined to. And infact with subject series the affinity also is >> updated for the CPU which owns the last timer expiry event. >> >> What am I missing here ? > > Dynamic affinity will work only if the following flag is set for a > clock_event_device: CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DYNIRQ, otherwise wakeup > would happen on the cpu to which static affinity was set to. > I should have looked at the patches in order first :) Sorry for the noise. Regards, Santosh