From: "Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" <metze@samba.org>
To: Dave Chiluk <chiluk@canonical.com>
Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CIFS: Decrease reconnection delay when switching nics
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:06:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <512DE8A6.9030000@samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361831310-24260-1-git-send-email-chiluk@canonical.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1424 bytes --]
Hi Dave,
> When messages are currently in queue awaiting a response, decrease amount of
> time before attempting cifs_reconnect to SMB_MAX_RTT = 10 seconds. The current
> wait time before attempting to reconnect is currently 2*SMB_ECHO_INTERVAL(120
> seconds) since the last response was recieved. This does not take into account
> the fact that messages waiting for a response should be serviced within a
> reasonable round trip time.
Wouldn't that mean that the client will disconnect a good connection,
if the server doesn't response within 10 seconds?
Reads and Writes can take longer than 10 seconds...
> This fixes the issue where user moves from wired to wireless or vice versa
> causing the mount to hang for 120 seconds, when it could reconnect considerably
> faster. After this fix it will take SMB_MAX_RTT (10 seconds) from the last
> time the user attempted to access the volume or SMB_MAX_RTT after the last
> echo. The worst case of the latter scenario being
> 2*SMB_ECHO_INTERVAL+SMB_MAX_RTT+small scheduling delay (about 130 seconds).
> Statistically speaking it would normally reconnect sooner. However in the best
> case where the user changes nics, and immediately tries to access the cifs
> share it will take SMB_MAX_RTT=10 seconds.
I think it would be better to detect the broken connection
by using an AF_NETLINK socket listening for RTM_DELADDR
messages?
metze
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 261 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-27 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-25 22:28 [PATCH] CIFS: Decrease reconnection delay when switching nics Dave Chiluk
2013-02-27 11:06 ` Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [this message]
2013-02-27 16:34 ` Jeff Layton
2013-02-27 22:24 ` Dave Chiluk
2013-02-27 22:40 ` Steve French
2013-02-27 22:44 ` Dave Chiluk
2013-02-28 0:17 ` Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
2013-02-28 1:25 ` simo
2013-02-28 1:26 ` Tom Talpey
2013-02-28 15:26 ` Jeff Layton
2013-02-28 16:04 ` Steve French
2013-02-28 16:47 ` Jeff Layton
2013-02-28 17:31 ` Dave Chiluk
2013-02-28 17:45 ` Steve French
2013-02-28 18:04 ` Jeff Layton
2013-02-28 22:23 ` simo
2013-02-28 22:54 ` Björn JACKE
2013-03-01 0:11 ` Jeff Layton
2013-03-01 2:54 ` Steve French
2013-02-28 0:15 ` Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
2013-02-28 13:01 ` Tom Talpey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=512DE8A6.9030000@samba.org \
--to=metze@samba.org \
--cc=chiluk@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox