From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752918Ab3B1IZL (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2013 03:25:11 -0500 Received: from ch1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.181]:36544 "EHLO ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752442Ab3B1IZJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2013 03:25:09 -0500 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:mail.freescale.net;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: 19 X-BigFish: VS19(z3121kz98dIc89bh936eIzz1f42h1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1082kzzz2dh2a8h668h839h93fhd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh1354h137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19c3h1ad9h133w1155h) Message-ID: <512F146F.6000608@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:25:19 +0800 From: Huang Shijie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CC: , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] mtd: add new fields to nand_flash_dev{} References: <1359349039-11510-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <1359349039-11510-2-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <1360684037.12703.117.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1360684037.12703.117.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 于 2013年02月12日 23:47, Artem Bityutskiy 写道: > On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 12:57 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: >> + {"SmartMedia 256MiB 3,3V", {0, 0x71}, 512, 256, 0x4000 }, >> + {"SmartMedia 256MiB 3,3V ROM", {0, 0x5b}, 512, 256, 0x4000, >> NAND_ROM}, > Sorry for a possibly stupid question, but what does it buy you adding > another "0" to all the entries? I see you add another table, which you > look up if the "traditional" table does not work. Why you need to add > these zeroes? > just a ping. are we missing the merge window again? thanks Huang Shijie